Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Ken H to debate Fred Z
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 2331225" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>I believe that the company was initially indifferent about healthcare, until they realized that the union wanted it.</p><p></p><p>I believe that the company wanted all employees in their plan, in order to purchase more coverage for a bigger group, or they wanted out.</p><p></p><p>Local autonomy was a disadvantage in this case, as some Locals and Regions have multi-employer HC funds, and they would be devastated without UPS contributions.</p><p></p><p>This is where the Teamsters lost a multitude of leverage at the bargaining table.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 2331225, member: 14176"] I believe that the company was initially indifferent about healthcare, until they realized that the union wanted it. I believe that the company wanted all employees in their plan, in order to purchase more coverage for a bigger group, or they wanted out. Local autonomy was a disadvantage in this case, as some Locals and Regions have multi-employer HC funds, and they would be devastated without UPS contributions. This is where the Teamsters lost a multitude of leverage at the bargaining table. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Ken H to debate Fred Z
Top