Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Airline / Gateway
Local 2727 update
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aquaholic5150" data-source="post: 806133" data-attributes="member: 32696"><p>you are so right as well but as you know the current contract language has stood up in arbitration cases as well as company appeals in the courts. I am not sure it has fully stopped the companies practice of getting work done overseas but we have language right now to at least check them on it. If we give that language away and we agree in any shape or form of outsourcing they might as well send a "resume maker" DVD with the T/A when we vote. I won't have the seniority to be around when we start losing jobs. With the Companies release of the 4th qtr. earnings and projections for the future coupled with us taking delivery of (1) 747 and (2) 767 in April 2011, (2) 767 in June 2011 as well as (1) 767 in July 2011.Plus 15 or so 767 being delivered in the near future. I see more work coming down the line and ultimately our laid off members back to work .So why do we want to give this work away. Please guys read the scope of this T/A thoroughly. Leave the money articles alone until you can agree with the scope because it will not matter how much money is in Article 36,you can't collect it if you are laid off. Until someone here can convince me the language in Article 1 is in the best interest for myself, family and my union brothers/sisters I am rejecting this T/A with a NO vote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aquaholic5150, post: 806133, member: 32696"] you are so right as well but as you know the current contract language has stood up in arbitration cases as well as company appeals in the courts. I am not sure it has fully stopped the companies practice of getting work done overseas but we have language right now to at least check them on it. If we give that language away and we agree in any shape or form of outsourcing they might as well send a "resume maker" DVD with the T/A when we vote. I won't have the seniority to be around when we start losing jobs. With the Companies release of the 4th qtr. earnings and projections for the future coupled with us taking delivery of (1) 747 and (2) 767 in April 2011, (2) 767 in June 2011 as well as (1) 767 in July 2011.Plus 15 or so 767 being delivered in the near future. I see more work coming down the line and ultimately our laid off members back to work .So why do we want to give this work away. Please guys read the scope of this T/A thoroughly. Leave the money articles alone until you can agree with the scope because it will not matter how much money is in Article 36,you can't collect it if you are laid off. Until someone here can convince me the language in Article 1 is in the best interest for myself, family and my union brothers/sisters I am rejecting this T/A with a NO vote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Airline / Gateway
Local 2727 update
Top