Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 89 Executive Board Recommend NO Vote On UPS TA!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evil" data-source="post: 1138014" data-attributes="member: 38035"><p>The biggest UPS Hub in the nation recommends a no vote!</p><p></p><p>Among others issues with the proposed agreement, the following changes and additions motivated the motion to reject:</p><p></p><p><strong>Economic</strong></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The raises contained in the agreement, both hourly and mileage rates, fall below the guaranteed increases in the 2008-13 Contract.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> There has been no solid information on how the move from the company health plans to Central States will affect members.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> There are no pension increases in the first four years. The fifth year contains an increase of only $5.00.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The 4-year progression contained in the proposed agreement is entirely unacceptable to members moving into full-time positions.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The penalty pay language contained in Article 17 is concessionary, raising the dollar amount on pay shortages.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> There are no protections on full-time positions.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The starting wage continues to be substandard and continues to subject our newest members to poverty.</li> </ul><p></p><p><strong>Non-Economic</strong></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> 9.5 language falls very short of fixing the problem and does not protect members with less than four years of seniority.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The proposed Article 37 language does nothing to fix harassment issues.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Article 14 language will result in job loss for members who cannot return to work in three years.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> The problems with Surepost have not been fully addressed. Package Car routes will continue to be depleted.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Teamsters Local 89</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evil, post: 1138014, member: 38035"] The biggest UPS Hub in the nation recommends a no vote! Among others issues with the proposed agreement, the following changes and additions motivated the motion to reject: [B]Economic[/B] [LIST] [*] The raises contained in the agreement, both hourly and mileage rates, fall below the guaranteed increases in the 2008-13 Contract. [*] There has been no solid information on how the move from the company health plans to Central States will affect members. [*] There are no pension increases in the first four years. The fifth year contains an increase of only $5.00. [*] The 4-year progression contained in the proposed agreement is entirely unacceptable to members moving into full-time positions. [*] The penalty pay language contained in Article 17 is concessionary, raising the dollar amount on pay shortages. [*] There are no protections on full-time positions. [*] The starting wage continues to be substandard and continues to subject our newest members to poverty. [/LIST] [B]Non-Economic[/B] [LIST] [*] 9.5 language falls very short of fixing the problem and does not protect members with less than four years of seniority. [*] The proposed Article 37 language does nothing to fix harassment issues. [*] Article 14 language will result in job loss for members who cannot return to work in three years. [*] The problems with Surepost have not been fully addressed. Package Car routes will continue to be depleted. [/LIST] Teamsters Local 89 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 89 Executive Board Recommend NO Vote On UPS TA!
Top