Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Michele Bachmans turn at the Stupid Wheel with Obama!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 856141" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p><span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>In no way am I defending the pledge or Bachmann's pandering to this group but the statement of:</strong></em></span></span></span> <span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>is a correct statement. However there are studies that indicate that some females who exhibit "tom boyish" traits do have a higher level of testosterone than those who are more feminine. The scientist doing the study said that the results didn't indicate any proof but gave them a direction for further study. I unaware of any further studies on the subject(if anyone has, I would be interested in reading them). IMO, this would be a better place to invest money than the mating habits of the tree frog</strong></em></span></span></span> <span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>or some of the other ridiculous grants given out. I have no doubt that some homosexuals are "born that way" or that some become attracted to the same gender by environmental situations, however neither way has ever been proven by science. I can not fathom why any person would make a decision to be homosexual. the life that they would be "choosing" is a hard life filled with negatives and few positives. </strong></em></span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 856141, member: 13254"] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]In no way am I defending the pledge or Bachmann's pandering to this group but the statement of:[/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]is a correct statement. However there are studies that indicate that some females who exhibit "tom boyish" traits do have a higher level of testosterone than those who are more feminine. The scientist doing the study said that the results didn't indicate any proof but gave them a direction for further study. I unaware of any further studies on the subject(if anyone has, I would be interested in reading them). IMO, this would be a better place to invest money than the mating habits of the tree frog[/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]or some of the other ridiculous grants given out. I have no doubt that some homosexuals are "born that way" or that some become attracted to the same gender by environmental situations, however neither way has ever been proven by science. I can not fathom why any person would make a decision to be homosexual. the life that they would be "choosing" is a hard life filled with negatives and few positives. [/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Michele Bachmans turn at the Stupid Wheel with Obama!
Top