Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Need Help with Fed Ex policy in 90's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ricochet1a" data-source="post: 1114924" data-attributes="member: 22880"><p>Now it does make sense. See... there was indeed something else motivating this inquiry OTHER than a supposed package (tax liability is the reason...).</p><p></p><p>Without going into any real detail about myself, I will state that I lived in California in the past, and the tax authorities in CA will go to ANY LENGTH to attempt to levy taxes on both former residents AND individuals who had a 'residence' in CA but who were legal residents of another state. So the 'reason' given for the inquiry now makes PERFECT sense. </p><p></p><p>So....</p><p></p><p>I'd recommend the OP ask any Courier that was working for Express in '91 (and has some method of proving employment at that time), to get them to set up an exchange of Private Mails to facilitate obtaining a sworn affidavit for this firm's attempt to prove to the tax authorities of CA that the 'fact' that a package was sent in the client's name to the client's old address, in NO WAY denotes that the client was an actual resident of CA at the time - and the fact that someone may have signed for this package (in error), in no way proves that the client maintained residency at the time the package was delivered. </p><p></p><p>I'd recommend that the OP provide through Private Mail, the name of the law firm, address and land line telephone for any Courier interested in providing an affidavit to prove this client's assertion. This would enable the Courier to check (Google) that the firm is indeed legit (to ensure that FedEx PR isn't trying a fast one) - then place a telephone call to the land line (NOT cell phone) to be connected to who (I'm presuming) is a paralegal gathering facts to prove the client's assertion. I would have to assume that the paralegal would then set up an 'appointment' with either an attorney or possibly even a notary public near where the responding Courier resides, to take the affidavit, notarize it and forward it to the firm representing the 'client'. </p><p></p><p>The firm representing this client should be willing to pay for any expenses incurred by the individual providing this affidavit, including time spent in correspondence, traveling to provide the affidavit, writing the affidavit an any other needs requested by the firm - to be determined by a mutually agreeable rate. </p><p></p><p>I'll leave it at that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ricochet1a, post: 1114924, member: 22880"] Now it does make sense. See... there was indeed something else motivating this inquiry OTHER than a supposed package (tax liability is the reason...). Without going into any real detail about myself, I will state that I lived in California in the past, and the tax authorities in CA will go to ANY LENGTH to attempt to levy taxes on both former residents AND individuals who had a 'residence' in CA but who were legal residents of another state. So the 'reason' given for the inquiry now makes PERFECT sense. So.... I'd recommend the OP ask any Courier that was working for Express in '91 (and has some method of proving employment at that time), to get them to set up an exchange of Private Mails to facilitate obtaining a sworn affidavit for this firm's attempt to prove to the tax authorities of CA that the 'fact' that a package was sent in the client's name to the client's old address, in NO WAY denotes that the client was an actual resident of CA at the time - and the fact that someone may have signed for this package (in error), in no way proves that the client maintained residency at the time the package was delivered. I'd recommend that the OP provide through Private Mail, the name of the law firm, address and land line telephone for any Courier interested in providing an affidavit to prove this client's assertion. This would enable the Courier to check (Google) that the firm is indeed legit (to ensure that FedEx PR isn't trying a fast one) - then place a telephone call to the land line (NOT cell phone) to be connected to who (I'm presuming) is a paralegal gathering facts to prove the client's assertion. I would have to assume that the paralegal would then set up an 'appointment' with either an attorney or possibly even a notary public near where the responding Courier resides, to take the affidavit, notarize it and forward it to the firm representing the 'client'. The firm representing this client should be willing to pay for any expenses incurred by the individual providing this affidavit, including time spent in correspondence, traveling to provide the affidavit, writing the affidavit an any other needs requested by the firm - to be determined by a mutually agreeable rate. I'll leave it at that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Need Help with Fed Ex policy in 90's
Top