Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Regarding supervisor working.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="curiousbrain" data-source="post: 1069945" data-attributes="member: 31608"><p>In the context of why supervisors work, the reasons vary: some genuinely do feel bad for <strong>friends</strong> who are loaders, and are getting rocked; so, maybe they get help. Now, the obvious counterpoint is that they will continue to work safely, no matter the speed since production is none of their concern. In practice, though, even the people who swear they don't give a crap get incredibly stressed out when there are too many packages for them to load - and will not grieve if you just ask them: "Would you like me to help you?" If they say no, and it is really bad, a supervisor can always pull the "egress" card, but that is a murky pond of meetings, grey area, and perspective. Maybe not in all areas, but at least where I am employed.</p><p></p><p>Another context is the obvious one: make "the numbers." This is kind of an omnipresent pressure that, I imagine, varies from center to center. In the center where I am employed, the general tactic is to start early on Monday (when all the loads are sitting on the doors or are in the yard), and blow the building apart from the unload. Then, on Tuesday, our heaviest day, the volume is so high relative to the hours of the shift, we smoke the numbers. In the fantasy land of numbers, this puts us up for the week by at least 10, maybe 15 or 20 PPH. Thus, we can relax a little bit for the rest of the week and let everyone breathe a little. I don't imagine that tactic works in every center, but where I am employed it makes the "number game" a little easier.</p><p></p><p>Another area of contention is that part-time soups are often told to work by their bosses - do this, do that. And, really, since the grievance that may result is not a personal debt, but rather incurred on the part of the company - sure, tell me to work and I will; but, "they" will foot the bill for their decision, and if I go to panel, I damn sure won't lie for anyone.</p><p></p><p>On a practical level, though, I think most part-time hourlies take the following perspective: the work is hard, and I'll take a little help here and there to make it a little easier. What that translates to in actual monetary or employment terms, I don't know - maybe a lot, maybe a little, maybe it breaks even.</p><p></p><p>Last, I'd say that, at times, I am required to work because of absenteeism, volume spikes, or other extreme circumstances - whenever I do, I push myself very hard because, in my own opinion, it is a physical job and it goes a long way for those I supervise to know that I can do any job I ask them to do, and maybe even do it better. Not because I need to stroke my ego, but because I think it is an issue of respect - yes, I supervise them, but on some level, there is an understanding.</p><p></p><p>Maybe that is fanciful or wishful thinking on my part, but it's worked OK for me so far.</p><p></p><p>edit: I wouldn't say that your center is weird, probably average. Despite all the blathering above that I did, it's mostly a personal decision for a supervisor to work or not - we can't really be fired for missing the numbers, we would just be moved to another area where we can fail less. So, with that aside, it's a personal decision that largely depends on any given circumstance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="curiousbrain, post: 1069945, member: 31608"] In the context of why supervisors work, the reasons vary: some genuinely do feel bad for [B]friends[/B] who are loaders, and are getting rocked; so, maybe they get help. Now, the obvious counterpoint is that they will continue to work safely, no matter the speed since production is none of their concern. In practice, though, even the people who swear they don't give a crap get incredibly stressed out when there are too many packages for them to load - and will not grieve if you just ask them: "Would you like me to help you?" If they say no, and it is really bad, a supervisor can always pull the "egress" card, but that is a murky pond of meetings, grey area, and perspective. Maybe not in all areas, but at least where I am employed. Another context is the obvious one: make "the numbers." This is kind of an omnipresent pressure that, I imagine, varies from center to center. In the center where I am employed, the general tactic is to start early on Monday (when all the loads are sitting on the doors or are in the yard), and blow the building apart from the unload. Then, on Tuesday, our heaviest day, the volume is so high relative to the hours of the shift, we smoke the numbers. In the fantasy land of numbers, this puts us up for the week by at least 10, maybe 15 or 20 PPH. Thus, we can relax a little bit for the rest of the week and let everyone breathe a little. I don't imagine that tactic works in every center, but where I am employed it makes the "number game" a little easier. Another area of contention is that part-time soups are often told to work by their bosses - do this, do that. And, really, since the grievance that may result is not a personal debt, but rather incurred on the part of the company - sure, tell me to work and I will; but, "they" will foot the bill for their decision, and if I go to panel, I damn sure won't lie for anyone. On a practical level, though, I think most part-time hourlies take the following perspective: the work is hard, and I'll take a little help here and there to make it a little easier. What that translates to in actual monetary or employment terms, I don't know - maybe a lot, maybe a little, maybe it breaks even. Last, I'd say that, at times, I am required to work because of absenteeism, volume spikes, or other extreme circumstances - whenever I do, I push myself very hard because, in my own opinion, it is a physical job and it goes a long way for those I supervise to know that I can do any job I ask them to do, and maybe even do it better. Not because I need to stroke my ego, but because I think it is an issue of respect - yes, I supervise them, but on some level, there is an understanding. Maybe that is fanciful or wishful thinking on my part, but it's worked OK for me so far. edit: I wouldn't say that your center is weird, probably average. Despite all the blathering above that I did, it's mostly a personal decision for a supervisor to work or not - we can't really be fired for missing the numbers, we would just be moved to another area where we can fail less. So, with that aside, it's a personal decision that largely depends on any given circumstance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Regarding supervisor working.
Top