UPS is required by OSHA to have a Safety Commitee.
It is not a requirement, nor is it even desired, that the Committee ever accomplish anything.
Authentic safety improvements cost money, and the last thing that the company wants is an independent, employee-controlled organization within UPS that could potentially cost money.
So the best way to control that Committee...is to co-opt it. Put it "in charge" of safe, cheap, meaningless little things like audits and acronyms and word games. Keep it "busy" with activities that are easy to take credit for such as contests and barbecues. And, most importantly, give the "leaders" of the committee preferential treatment and special priveleges in exchange for their cooperation.
Done properly, the result is a "Safety Committee" that is completely under the control of the company.
soberups,
Your appraisal of the committees being completely under the control of the company is accurate.
By their actions this appears to be the way the local union officials want it.
All Teamsters have a stake in tha safety committees.
Why do you think the local union officials are refusing to enforce the contract language pertaining to safety committees?
Disbanding safety committees is wrong. Enforcing the contract language is right.
Disbanding safety committees is simply showing, the company, OSHA, the world that unions are unreasonable.
This is a sign of imaturity on the leaderships part.
The local union officials have allowed this problem to get out of hand, it is up to them to take whatever steps they need to to make it right.
They should start by meticulously following the safety committee language in the National Agreement Article 18 Sec 20.4.
Sincerely,
I