Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Scan help if possible
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sdf6hr2" data-source="post: 592464" data-attributes="member: 18356"><p>sorry, i didn't think it was that bad. here goes with a partial translation...</p><p> </p><p>"PLIB" = pkg. left in building</p><p> </p><p>"'logically' pull the pkg. along"= the tracking system relies on elementary logic principles for most (i think) of its info... example:</p><p> </p><p>pkg. A loaded into can B; can B loaded into aircraft C; a/c C departs airport D:</p><p> </p><p>ups assumes pkg. A has departed airport D. although pkg. A was only physically scanned once, we generally assume it has departed airport D using logic and logical scans.</p><p> </p><p>now, when a loader misses <strong>loading</strong> a scanned pkg. into a container (or feeder for that matter) the scanning system still <strong>assumes</strong> the scanned pkg. is loaded in the container until 'proven wrong'. </p><p> </p><p>the only way to prove the scanning system 'wrong' is with another physical scan. which is why i assume the pkgs. in question were PLIBs. it is the easiest way to explain the TX to louisville "jump". the pkgs. actually never left louisville... its like the scanning sys. fell for a 'three card monty' or a killer head fake.</p><p> </p><p>they were scanned again Sun. morning and i'm sure made it thru Sun. sort and delivered 1st thing Mon. morning...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sdf6hr2, post: 592464, member: 18356"] sorry, i didn't think it was that bad. here goes with a partial translation... "PLIB" = pkg. left in building "'logically' pull the pkg. along"= the tracking system relies on elementary logic principles for most (i think) of its info... example: pkg. A loaded into can B; can B loaded into aircraft C; a/c C departs airport D: ups assumes pkg. A has departed airport D. although pkg. A was only physically scanned once, we generally assume it has departed airport D using logic and logical scans. now, when a loader misses [B]loading[/B] a scanned pkg. into a container (or feeder for that matter) the scanning system still [B]assumes[/B] the scanned pkg. is loaded in the container until 'proven wrong'. the only way to prove the scanning system 'wrong' is with another physical scan. which is why i assume the pkgs. in question were PLIBs. it is the easiest way to explain the TX to louisville "jump". the pkgs. actually never left louisville... its like the scanning sys. fell for a 'three card monty' or a killer head fake. they were scanned again Sun. morning and i'm sure made it thru Sun. sort and delivered 1st thing Mon. morning... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Scan help if possible
Top