Spying Against The Trump Campaign Team Feared By Dimwits

[bbsam]

I agree, I am biased as is every person on Earth.
However, I am not a goofball like you!
Although it wouldn't bother me if I was.

Note: Biased is the adjective.
Goofball is the noun.

Not a goofball? Come now. Of course you are.

 

[newfie]

Mueller only said no after an investigation...which just so happens to be the purpose of an investigation, to be able to say yes or no.

Agreed he did say no

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Not a goofball? Come now. Of course you are.

Oh yeah ... like I said, it wouldn't bother me.
Being a goofball is actually one of my better traits.

 

[bbsam]

Agreed he did say no

No collusion and didn’t make a determination on obstruction.

I don’t know how clear you need me to be except to add that it certainly wasn’t the “totally exonerated” report the president was trying to spin.

 

[bbsam]

Oh yeah ... like I said, it wouldn't bother me.
Being a goofball is actually one of my better traits.

So why did you say you weren’t one.

Let me guess: you didn’t want to brag!

Yeah, right.

 

[Fred's Myth]

Whatever. You’re such a smug wannabe “above the fray” libertardian.

Clinton has his spooge all over a blue dress.

Trump’s campaign looked to be surrounded by people with known contacts to a country implicated in cyber disruption of the US presidential election. And the Trump campaign doesn’t even deny it. They just say Obama should have done more.

The two are hardly on the same plane even though Trump/Barr and others would have you believe they are.

How, exactly, did Russia “cyber disrupt” the U.S. presidential election?
Is spinning a false narrative/disinformation considered cyber disruption?
I would define cyber disruption as hacking the polls and altering the results, which would justify a massive investigation.
But that’s just me.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

So why did you say you weren’t one.

Let me guess: you didn’t want to brag!

Yeah, right.

Cause I was dissing on you!

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

I am biased as is every person on Earth

Ok Van, stop making generalizations to make yourself feel better. Not everyone is biased

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Ok can, stop making generalizations to make yourself feel better. Not everyone is biased

Name someone that you and I would know who isn't biased!

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

Name someone that you and I would know who isn't biased!

Me

And autocorrect got me on that last post. I fixed it

 

[newfie]

No collusion and didn’t make a determination on obstruction.

I don’t know how clear you need me to be except to add that it certainly wasn’t the “totally exonerated” report the president was trying to spin.

its a binary decision prosecute or not enough to prosecute. not enough to prosecute is an exhoneration.

your democratic blowhard leaderships actions are telling you that too. If their was enough evidence to impeach they would be calling a vote. Instead their gnawing on a bone and pretending to act like their something there just to appease the most radical left wingers.

i listened to Hakeem jefferies on morning joe today. he did everything he could to moon walk away from impeachment talk. he is one of many who are trying to distance theirselves from this partisan acidic rhetoric.

 

[newfie]

Is spinning a false narrative/disinformation considered cyber disruption?

libs spin false narratives better then any russian ever did

 

[bbsam]

its a binary decision prosecute or not enough to prosecute. not enough to prosecute is an exhoneration

No, it most certainly is not.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

No, it most certainly is not.

From a legal perspective, he is correct.
From a political perspective, he is wrong.
Impeachment is a political process ... not a legal one.

 

[newfie]

No, it most certainly is not.

I'm sorry you're not allowed to rewrite the law. your argument is silly and desperate. you can do better then to present yourself as one of those desperate snowflakes here. but if not go ahead with your silliness.

 

[newfie]

From a legal perspective, he is correct.
From a political perspective, he is wrong.
Impeachment is a political process ... not a legal one.

on this we differ. Politics be damned there has to be a high crime to impeach on.

 

[bbsam]

I'm sorry you're not allowed to rewrite the law. your argument is silly and desperate. you can do better then to present yourself as one of those desperate snowflakes here. but if not go ahead with your silliness.

Not rewriting anything. Maybe you need the definition of exonerated.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

on this we differ. Politics be damned there has to be a high crime to impeach on.

And the decision whether it is a high crime or misdemeanor is a political one.
Just like with Clinton ... totally political.

 

[newfie]

Not rewriting anything. Maybe you need the definition of exonerated.

i dont seem to see any charges filed nor any impeachment proceedings did I miss something ?

or thats right a couple of political glory hounds are still investigating . haha.

i'll put you down in the desperate catagory.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

not enough to prosecute is an exhoneration.

LMFAO!
Wrong.
Report literally says the exact opposite.
You are so gullible.
Sad.