Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Surepost question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kingOFchester" data-source="post: 997946" data-attributes="member: 11246"><p>I would love to say that I am against Surepost. Actually it does hurt the amount of drivers. But I certainly would give up the drivers to keep UPS competitive and in business. If we didn't offer the same type of service as our competitors, they would end up getting all of that type of business. It is what it is. It is a competitive service UPS needs to offer in order to have at least part of the handling (union labor)of those packages movement. Rather have some part in the movement then no part.</p><p></p><p>In a perfect UPS world, if we didn't offer this service the volume would still stay at UPS. UPS can't keep the volume, offer the same price (or better) and still remain profitable. If we didn't offer the cut rate service (and cut rate price) that volume would more then likely go to our competitor. </p><p></p><p>Grammer seems off....but I think it makes sense.?.?</p><p></p><p>Note to self, dont drink and post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kingOFchester, post: 997946, member: 11246"] I would love to say that I am against Surepost. Actually it does hurt the amount of drivers. But I certainly would give up the drivers to keep UPS competitive and in business. If we didn't offer the same type of service as our competitors, they would end up getting all of that type of business. It is what it is. It is a competitive service UPS needs to offer in order to have at least part of the handling (union labor)of those packages movement. Rather have some part in the movement then no part. In a perfect UPS world, if we didn't offer this service the volume would still stay at UPS. UPS can't keep the volume, offer the same price (or better) and still remain profitable. If we didn't offer the cut rate service (and cut rate price) that volume would more then likely go to our competitor. Grammer seems off....but I think it makes sense.?.? Note to self, dont drink and post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Surepost question
Top