Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 809959" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Websters defines the word arbitrary as "Resulting from personal inclination entirely, decided by chance or whim". So it really has no bearing on the decision to require the employees cover up tattos. Things, for better or worse, change. What used to be the stray service member that had a tat on his upper arm, or more rarely on the forearm is not what we are talking about. ITs the guy/gal that has the legs, hands, face tatted. Not to mention multitudes of piercings.</p><p> </p><p>So the need for new rules and regulations has happened. The employees that have demanded more "self impression and individuality" have pushed the envelope to the point that some sort of action had to take place.</p><p> </p><p>THe company can legally change what it deems proper appearance standards and has done so in the past. All they have to do is equally apply the rules across the board to everyone. I am sure exceptions will be made for those that are grandfathered in, but those will be in the minority.</p><p> </p><p>Again, understand, this would never been an issues had it not been for the few wanting to "show their ink" regardless of taste or acceptance by the company. And now they want to force the issue.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 809959, member: 484"] Websters defines the word arbitrary as "Resulting from personal inclination entirely, decided by chance or whim". So it really has no bearing on the decision to require the employees cover up tattos. Things, for better or worse, change. What used to be the stray service member that had a tat on his upper arm, or more rarely on the forearm is not what we are talking about. ITs the guy/gal that has the legs, hands, face tatted. Not to mention multitudes of piercings. So the need for new rules and regulations has happened. The employees that have demanded more "self impression and individuality" have pushed the envelope to the point that some sort of action had to take place. THe company can legally change what it deems proper appearance standards and has done so in the past. All they have to do is equally apply the rules across the board to everyone. I am sure exceptions will be made for those that are grandfathered in, but those will be in the minority. Again, understand, this would never been an issues had it not been for the few wanting to "show their ink" regardless of taste or acceptance by the company. And now they want to force the issue. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tattoos?
Top