Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Teamsters Local 89
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chuchu" data-source="post: 1200604"><p>Fred and almost every hub in Ohio has got a point. If we are giving concessions when the company is making record profits we will always be giving in to concessionary and divisive language changes in the future contracts. I'm glad the No! vote helped get rid if some of the bad article changes. We have a guy who is a great worker and family man that was MMI'd and would've been terminated upon ratification of the contract as proposed the first time around. Can any steward say the negative language changes are good? There's no way I'd vote for single day vacation drivers to work all year long, not covering vacation days, to keep part time workers from getting a full time job. What's good about that? </p><p></p><p>BTW: the company plan that 89 and a lot of us are on is not the plan the management is on FYI. And no one except Hall said we'd have to pay $100/ WK because that was the first fake offer from UPS.</p><p></p><p> Looks like 177 took the same $ the company offered the IBT and bought better insurance with less than 140,000 additional workers added! It appears the IBT is selling us less insurance than what we're entitled to and using us for sacrificial pawns, giving concessions right and left to line their pockets.</p><p></p><p>That, is bull.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chuchu, post: 1200604"] Fred and almost every hub in Ohio has got a point. If we are giving concessions when the company is making record profits we will always be giving in to concessionary and divisive language changes in the future contracts. I'm glad the No! vote helped get rid if some of the bad article changes. We have a guy who is a great worker and family man that was MMI'd and would've been terminated upon ratification of the contract as proposed the first time around. Can any steward say the negative language changes are good? There's no way I'd vote for single day vacation drivers to work all year long, not covering vacation days, to keep part time workers from getting a full time job. What's good about that? BTW: the company plan that 89 and a lot of us are on is not the plan the management is on FYI. And no one except Hall said we'd have to pay $100/ WK because that was the first fake offer from UPS. Looks like 177 took the same $ the company offered the IBT and bought better insurance with less than 140,000 additional workers added! It appears the IBT is selling us less insurance than what we're entitled to and using us for sacrificial pawns, giving concessions right and left to line their pockets. That, is bull. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Teamsters Local 89
Top