Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
telematics?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FracusBrown" data-source="post: 769005" data-attributes="member: 29360"><p>No need to respond. I'll give the facts. Take your time. Do some research.</p><p> </p><p>97.5 is the installation verification MAR. This is the percentage of units that worked correctly at least one time after installation. All center were required to meet this before going live.</p><p> </p><p>The current percent with comm errors is much higher. A unit with a comm error means at least one of the measured elements contains a device error. Some centers are over 50%. Corporately the number was 15.11% in August. I stand corrected, but there are many areas over 30% as I stated. Ask your partners for the comm error report. They send it out the the world weekly to be posted and shared.</p><p> </p><p>Cumulative measured (engine, start, fuel, etc) on road failures for telematics sites is up by 24. Relatively flat considering the number of installed units. No reduction.</p><p> </p><p>Starters, alt, and other parts are on the same time interval nationwide in both telematic and non telematic sites.</p><p> </p><p>With no reduction in parts use and no reduction in breakdowns there can be no related cost savings. </p><p> </p><p>Your assertion that you have access to more information is based upon what? </p><p> </p><p>As far as the performance of the people making these decisions, you have to be joking...the worst decisions in history are being made and the results show it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FracusBrown, post: 769005, member: 29360"] No need to respond. I'll give the facts. Take your time. Do some research. 97.5 is the installation verification MAR. This is the percentage of units that worked correctly at least one time after installation. All center were required to meet this before going live. The current percent with comm errors is much higher. A unit with a comm error means at least one of the measured elements contains a device error. Some centers are over 50%. Corporately the number was 15.11% in August. I stand corrected, but there are many areas over 30% as I stated. Ask your partners for the comm error report. They send it out the the world weekly to be posted and shared. Cumulative measured (engine, start, fuel, etc) on road failures for telematics sites is up by 24. Relatively flat considering the number of installed units. No reduction. Starters, alt, and other parts are on the same time interval nationwide in both telematic and non telematic sites. With no reduction in parts use and no reduction in breakdowns there can be no related cost savings. Your assertion that you have access to more information is based upon what? As far as the performance of the people making these decisions, you have to be joking...the worst decisions in history are being made and the results show it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
telematics?
Top