Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The Cultural Contradiction of Liberalism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 738303" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Let's see, there's an atomic war, plane goes down on remote island and the survivors decide to re-create their own version of the State by appointing I think it was Ralph? From there it devolved into conflict as varying interests resorted to violence and manipulations to obtain group power or create a competing power and this proves the "no ruler" philosophy is the root at fault? I see your point, the logic of your thinking is overwhelming. I'm truly impressed. </p><p> </p><p>I stand corrected and see the error of my previously faulted thinking. I've been saved! </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p> </p><p>Seeing that man created States tend to be followed with it's own created chaos and violence, to see the same approach attempted "AGAIN" and the results that followed are not a surprise. Maybe they'd have been better served had they followed the advice of Roderick Long:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>BTW: I understand to some the word libertarianism is a tainted word and there is an arguement there but in place of the word in the quote above, use the terms natural law or natural liberty and it still works just as well. Maybe it works better as it removes a bit of political stain as people can't distinguish between "L"ibertarianism and "l"ibertarianism as the former is a political movement and the latter is a individual mindset. I prefer the latter always.</p><p> </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/peaceful.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":peaceful:" title="Peaceful :peaceful:" data-shortname=":peaceful:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 738303, member: 2189"] Let's see, there's an atomic war, plane goes down on remote island and the survivors decide to re-create their own version of the State by appointing I think it was Ralph? From there it devolved into conflict as varying interests resorted to violence and manipulations to obtain group power or create a competing power and this proves the "no ruler" philosophy is the root at fault? I see your point, the logic of your thinking is overwhelming. I'm truly impressed. I stand corrected and see the error of my previously faulted thinking. I've been saved! :wink2: Seeing that man created States tend to be followed with it's own created chaos and violence, to see the same approach attempted "AGAIN" and the results that followed are not a surprise. Maybe they'd have been better served had they followed the advice of Roderick Long: BTW: I understand to some the word libertarianism is a tainted word and there is an arguement there but in place of the word in the quote above, use the terms natural law or natural liberty and it still works just as well. Maybe it works better as it removes a bit of political stain as people can't distinguish between "L"ibertarianism and "l"ibertarianism as the former is a political movement and the latter is a individual mindset. I prefer the latter always. :peaceful: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The Cultural Contradiction of Liberalism
Top