Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Thoughts of your local...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="10 point" data-source="post: 1595418" data-attributes="member: 52520"><p>Did I miss something referring to retirees family plan costing $50/mo?</p><p>Ours paid at least $200/mo ... But I'm not there yet so it may have been more.</p><p></p><p>We had hoped for a mou.</p><p>All we could do was try.</p><p>Like local 89 it would have been forced upon us anyway.</p><p>We didn't like the mmi clause that was added; "service, methods, and safety" added to 17i; lack of protection from technology and most of the locals that voted No heavily (here in Ohio) may have had issues with their BAs or officials (from what I can see) and that didn't help matters.</p><p>The C6 plan (offered at first) was FAR from "mirroring" our existing plan. We had no idea Ohio locals were already in that plan.</p><p></p><p>It seemed that we were negotiating with the union instead of the company on so many issues. Some members being called "over paid cry babies" (or something similar) by a BA really helped boost confidence in leaders.</p><p>Maybe we're not informed as we should be (locally) or maybe the info is suspect do to the source but there were a lot of issues in this CBA and it wasn't all about healthcare when 18 supplements and riders failed in round 1.</p><p></p><p>In round 2 I think it (the Central) only passed by around 3,000 votes if I remember correctly.</p><p></p><p>I think that in itself shows a lack of trust in leadership (local and international) and a lack of in depth communication prior to July 31.</p><p>That's just my opinion from what I saw and experienced for what it's worth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="10 point, post: 1595418, member: 52520"] Did I miss something referring to retirees family plan costing $50/mo? Ours paid at least $200/mo ... But I'm not there yet so it may have been more. We had hoped for a mou. All we could do was try. Like local 89 it would have been forced upon us anyway. We didn't like the mmi clause that was added; "service, methods, and safety" added to 17i; lack of protection from technology and most of the locals that voted No heavily (here in Ohio) may have had issues with their BAs or officials (from what I can see) and that didn't help matters. The C6 plan (offered at first) was FAR from "mirroring" our existing plan. We had no idea Ohio locals were already in that plan. It seemed that we were negotiating with the union instead of the company on so many issues. Some members being called "over paid cry babies" (or something similar) by a BA really helped boost confidence in leaders. Maybe we're not informed as we should be (locally) or maybe the info is suspect do to the source but there were a lot of issues in this CBA and it wasn't all about healthcare when 18 supplements and riders failed in round 1. In round 2 I think it (the Central) only passed by around 3,000 votes if I remember correctly. I think that in itself shows a lack of trust in leadership (local and international) and a lack of in depth communication prior to July 31. That's just my opinion from what I saw and experienced for what it's worth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Thoughts of your local...
Top