Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
UPS talks pension cuts in letter to share holders.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="silenze" data-source="post: 2126587" data-attributes="member: 22804"><p>In addition to our eingoing multi-employer pension plan obligations, we may have additional exposure with respect to</p><p>benefits eamed in the Central States Pension Fund (the ,CSPF"), frorn which UPS withdrew in 2007 in return for fully funding</p><p>its allocable share of unfirnded vested benefits thereunder. In 2015, CSPF submitted a proposed pension suspensiou plan to the</p><p>U.S. Departnnent of Treasury under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (*MPRA") which proposes to make</p><p>retirement benefit reductions to CSPF participants, including to the benefits of certain UPS employee participants. Separately,</p><p>UPS agreed to provide supplemental benefits tmder the UPS/IBT Full-Time Employee Pension Plan to offset certain benefit</p><p>reductions under the CSPF. We have no other multi-employer pension plans subject to zuch a funding obligation. UPS has</p><p>reviewed the CSPF's proposed plan to evaluate the validity of the actions taken by the CSPF, the plan's compliance with the</p><p>MPRA (and proposed regulations thereunder) and its pctential impact on UPS's funding obligations under the {.IPSIIBT Full-</p><p>Time Employee Pension Plan. We are vigorously challenging the proposed suspension plan because it does not fully compty</p><p>with the law and we do not believe certain actions by CSPF are valid. Accordingly, we have not assumed or recognized a</p><p>liability for supplemental benefits within the UPSIIBT Full-Time Employee Pension Plan due to the submission of CSPF's</p><p>proposed plan to thg U.S. Department of Treasury. Further, we are not able to Estimate a range of additional obligationq if any,</p><p>or determine whether any such amounts are material due to a number of uncertainties relating to the MPRA (and proposed</p><p>regulations thereunder) and assumptions made by the CSPF in its proposed plan.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="silenze, post: 2126587, member: 22804"] In addition to our eingoing multi-employer pension plan obligations, we may have additional exposure with respect to benefits eamed in the Central States Pension Fund (the ,CSPF"), frorn which UPS withdrew in 2007 in return for fully funding its allocable share of unfirnded vested benefits thereunder. In 2015, CSPF submitted a proposed pension suspensiou plan to the U.S. Departnnent of Treasury under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (*MPRA") which proposes to make retirement benefit reductions to CSPF participants, including to the benefits of certain UPS employee participants. Separately, UPS agreed to provide supplemental benefits tmder the UPS/IBT Full-Time Employee Pension Plan to offset certain benefit reductions under the CSPF. We have no other multi-employer pension plans subject to zuch a funding obligation. UPS has reviewed the CSPF's proposed plan to evaluate the validity of the actions taken by the CSPF, the plan's compliance with the MPRA (and proposed regulations thereunder) and its pctential impact on UPS's funding obligations under the {.IPSIIBT Full- Time Employee Pension Plan. We are vigorously challenging the proposed suspension plan because it does not fully compty with the law and we do not believe certain actions by CSPF are valid. Accordingly, we have not assumed or recognized a liability for supplemental benefits within the UPSIIBT Full-Time Employee Pension Plan due to the submission of CSPF's proposed plan to thg U.S. Department of Treasury. Further, we are not able to Estimate a range of additional obligationq if any, or determine whether any such amounts are material due to a number of uncertainties relating to the MPRA (and proposed regulations thereunder) and assumptions made by the CSPF in its proposed plan. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
UPS talks pension cuts in letter to share holders.
Top