Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What to do if Neo-Con Is Found In Load
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 201776" data-attributes="member: 9859"><p>Originally Posted by <strong>diesel96</strong></p><p><em>I didn't think I needed to post these links Big Arrow,but since you shared your links I'll share mine.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Ref:Global Warming</em></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090526164929/http://www.ecobridge.org/content/g_cse.htm" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20090526164929/http://www.ecobridge.org/content/g_cse.htm</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.asp" target="_blank">http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.asp</a></em></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20080730070843/http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20080730070843/http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics</a></p><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/02/climate.change.report/" target="_blank">http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/02/climate.change.report/</a></p><p><em><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2023835.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2023835.stm</a></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>In this case I hope your are right with your Explanations/Links that it is global/ocean fluxuating climate changes and barely a human polluton/compsumption issue.However,to much evidence outweighs your "other scientist"that supposedly doesn't depend on funding and grants.Geez ,I wonder where they get their kick backs from?Or maybe they work for free?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>This isn't a Rep/Dem or Con/Lib issue,this is a human denial issue.</em></p><p></p><p>Big A quote"</p><p><em>"There isn't a shred of proof anywhere that is caused by man?"</em></p><p></p><p><em>Prior to that quote your claiming "there's proof" by your "other scientist"</em></p><p><em>Big A quote;</em></p><p>And what do other scientists think? Let's take a look.....</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=" target="_blank">http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/scientist-models-used-to-analyse-climate-change-are-incoherent-invalid-from-a-scientific-point-of-view/5543" target="_blank">http://www.globalresearch.ca/scientist-models-used-to-analyse-climate-change-are-incoherent-invalid-from-a-scientific-point-of-view/5543</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070428170229.htm" target="_blank">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070428170229.htm</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18397549/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18397549/</a></p><p></p><p><em>So in your view,your "other scientist" and pro-conservative links is all the proof you need to satisfy the far right anti-enviroment conservative agenda Claiming minuscule human involvement concerning global warming.</em></p><p></p><p><em>How ironic,conservatives who brag they love their country more than Libs, ignore and allow the possibility of global warming, the eventual slow decline in the quality of air we breath,the dependency of oil,CO2 Emmissions,dragging their feet with alternative fuel and power programs,etc...</em></p><p><em>And you guys call yourselves Patriots<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/lol.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Lol :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 201776, member: 9859"] Originally Posted by [B]diesel96[/B] [I]I didn't think I needed to post these links Big Arrow,but since you shared your links I'll share mine. Ref:Global Warming[/I] [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20090526164929/http://www.ecobridge.org/content/g_cse.htm[/url] [I][url]http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/f101.asp[/url][/I] [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20080730070843/http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics[/url] [url]http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/02/climate.change.report/[/url] [I][url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2023835.stm[/url] In this case I hope your are right with your Explanations/Links that it is global/ocean fluxuating climate changes and barely a human polluton/compsumption issue.However,to much evidence outweighs your "other scientist"that supposedly doesn't depend on funding and grants.Geez ,I wonder where they get their kick backs from?Or maybe they work for free? This isn't a Rep/Dem or Con/Lib issue,this is a human denial issue.[/I] Big A quote" [I]"There isn't a shred of proof anywhere that is caused by man?"[/I] [I]Prior to that quote your claiming "there's proof" by your "other scientist" Big A quote;[/I] And what do other scientists think? Let's take a look..... [url]http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12&Region_id=&Issue_id=[/url] [url]http://www.globalresearch.ca/scientist-models-used-to-analyse-climate-change-are-incoherent-invalid-from-a-scientific-point-of-view/5543[/url] [url]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070428170229.htm[/url] [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18397549/[/url] [I]So in your view,your "other scientist" and pro-conservative links is all the proof you need to satisfy the far right anti-enviroment conservative agenda Claiming minuscule human involvement concerning global warming.[/I] [I]How ironic,conservatives who brag they love their country more than Libs, ignore and allow the possibility of global warming, the eventual slow decline in the quality of air we breath,the dependency of oil,CO2 Emmissions,dragging their feet with alternative fuel and power programs,etc... And you guys call yourselves Patriots:lol:[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What to do if Neo-Con Is Found In Load
Top