Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What to do if Neo-Con Is Found In Load
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 202964" data-attributes="member: 9859"><p>I'am quite confident that any Rep who publicly supports the continuation of the Iraq Occupation/War will not get elected.There's a new generation of young voters for the last 8 yrs have grown up with war/enviroment/religious fanatisim/healthcare and economic concerns.World opinion of invovlement is also negative,our dependencey for foreign oil keeps us involved in the middle east for years to come.</p><p> </p><p>As far as Cindy Sheehan is concern,like you said,she doesn't represent mainstream Dems(niether does Rosie).Cindy has other issues also like her other children,like immediate stoppage of our troops in Iraq,which Dems didn't provide for her.</p><p> </p><p>Politics and deadlines dictated the war funding bill,Yes Dems want our troops out of Iraq(with a deadline) but we don't want Bush to leave them their with no funding.Hence Veto..Knowing the war funding bill had to be finalized,Dems had no choice to pass a compromise before deadline. Anyway the pres.canidates(osama & hillary) voted against it as to not be accused of flip-floping by the war hungry reps and the far leftys come election time.I really don't see any dissension among mianstream Dems just the extreme left.</p><p> </p><p>As far as Fred and Barney(I mean Newt of course) holding out,it could hurt them,they could be looked at as indecisive,create dissension among their fellow party candidates,afraid to debate the current issues of today, not a year from now.</p><p>And it could help them.Watching and observing the other canidates debate today's current events and levitate to the issues that effect us a year from now come closer to election time as to align themselves with public opinion so they won't have to flip flop on the issues.</p><p> </p><p>I kind of look at them as Vultures waiting in the wind for someone in their own party to raise to the top and then swoop down and eat their own and lay their nomination eggs in the Rep nest of wasteland.</p><p> </p><p>And don't forget Al Gore hasn't ruled himself out niether.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 202964, member: 9859"] I'am quite confident that any Rep who publicly supports the continuation of the Iraq Occupation/War will not get elected.There's a new generation of young voters for the last 8 yrs have grown up with war/enviroment/religious fanatisim/healthcare and economic concerns.World opinion of invovlement is also negative,our dependencey for foreign oil keeps us involved in the middle east for years to come. As far as Cindy Sheehan is concern,like you said,she doesn't represent mainstream Dems(niether does Rosie).Cindy has other issues also like her other children,like immediate stoppage of our troops in Iraq,which Dems didn't provide for her. Politics and deadlines dictated the war funding bill,Yes Dems want our troops out of Iraq(with a deadline) but we don't want Bush to leave them their with no funding.Hence Veto..Knowing the war funding bill had to be finalized,Dems had no choice to pass a compromise before deadline. Anyway the pres.canidates(osama & hillary) voted against it as to not be accused of flip-floping by the war hungry reps and the far leftys come election time.I really don't see any dissension among mianstream Dems just the extreme left. As far as Fred and Barney(I mean Newt of course) holding out,it could hurt them,they could be looked at as indecisive,create dissension among their fellow party candidates,afraid to debate the current issues of today, not a year from now. And it could help them.Watching and observing the other canidates debate today's current events and levitate to the issues that effect us a year from now come closer to election time as to align themselves with public opinion so they won't have to flip flop on the issues. I kind of look at them as Vultures waiting in the wind for someone in their own party to raise to the top and then swoop down and eat their own and lay their nomination eggs in the Rep nest of wasteland. And don't forget Al Gore hasn't ruled himself out niether. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What to do if Neo-Con Is Found In Load
Top