Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What would you do - 200 years ago
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bellesotico" data-source="post: 550175" data-attributes="member: 15614"><p><strong>Re: what would you do</strong></p><p></p><p>Pickup-</p><p></p><p>Article lll addresses the power vested in the Supreme Court. The defeat of Adams and the issue with 'midnight judges' gave Chief Justice Marshall the opportunity to better define the power of the Supreme Court. Madison v Marbury set the precedent that the Supreme Court could declare Acts of Congress unconstitutional. This decision solidifies "checks and balances". </p><p></p><p>I understand what you are trying to say..but you do realize you are making the same case Calhoun did...The issue of states rights was argued long before the Civil War..remember the Alien and Sedition Acts? </p><p>IMHO questioning the constitutionality of judicial review undermines and could potentially undue ANY case that has gone before the SC. </p><p></p><p>Implied power was written into the Constitution and vested to Congress. I'm not sure how Marbury v. Madison plays into the conception. </p><p></p><p>Enlighten me please. =)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bellesotico, post: 550175, member: 15614"] [b]Re: what would you do[/b] Pickup- Article lll addresses the power vested in the Supreme Court. The defeat of Adams and the issue with 'midnight judges' gave Chief Justice Marshall the opportunity to better define the power of the Supreme Court. Madison v Marbury set the precedent that the Supreme Court could declare Acts of Congress unconstitutional. This decision solidifies "checks and balances". I understand what you are trying to say..but you do realize you are making the same case Calhoun did...The issue of states rights was argued long before the Civil War..remember the Alien and Sedition Acts? IMHO questioning the constitutionality of judicial review undermines and could potentially undue ANY case that has gone before the SC. Implied power was written into the Constitution and vested to Congress. I'm not sure how Marbury v. Madison plays into the conception. Enlighten me please. =) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
What would you do - 200 years ago
Top