Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Yes or NO on NEW CONTRACT?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GuyinBrown" data-source="post: 249712" data-attributes="member: 9444"><p>Philly...</p><p></p><p>1 - Where'd you get this information? I will believe it when I see something from the local. </p><p></p><p>2- I don't think that asking somebody to wait 90 days before they get a $2 an hour raise is unreasonable. If you can't last 90 days, you had no intention of staying very long to begin with, so it's kind of a moot point. </p><p></p><p>3- I agree that making the part timers wait a year for individual coverage and 18 months for family coverage sucks if that part is true. However, the part you're failing to comprehend here is that it is a <em>part time job. </em>Name another company that provides part timers with these kinds of benefits after any amount of time with the company. The people this hurts are the ones that are only in it for the short term and don't intend to go full time at any point or make UPS a career. It weeds them out before the company has to make a significant investment in them. Again, I agree this seems a little too long, but if they aren't planning to stick with UPS, why should we be overly concerned with them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GuyinBrown, post: 249712, member: 9444"] Philly... 1 - Where'd you get this information? I will believe it when I see something from the local. 2- I don't think that asking somebody to wait 90 days before they get a $2 an hour raise is unreasonable. If you can't last 90 days, you had no intention of staying very long to begin with, so it's kind of a moot point. 3- I agree that making the part timers wait a year for individual coverage and 18 months for family coverage sucks if that part is true. However, the part you're failing to comprehend here is that it is a [I]part time job. [/I]Name another company that provides part timers with these kinds of benefits after any amount of time with the company. The people this hurts are the ones that are only in it for the short term and don't intend to go full time at any point or make UPS a career. It weeds them out before the company has to make a significant investment in them. Again, I agree this seems a little too long, but if they aren't planning to stick with UPS, why should we be overly concerned with them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Yes or NO on NEW CONTRACT?
Top