Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2/3 rule used to ratify supplements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 3781614" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>Other than the glossy mailings, the other listed costs are negligible. On the converse side, on line voting was far less expensive than mail in.</p><p>I'll grant the IBT didn't publish the contract voting procedures of the Constitution, but you did. Apparently no one (on these pages anyway) was listening as it became big news...after the fact.</p><p>The entire IBT Constitution is available for anyone to read on many sites, including Teamster.org.</p><p>IDK what criteria was considered as a threshold to use this language. Maybe one more no vote would have tipped the scale.</p><p>So we're now <em>once again</em> resurrecting that beaten to death horse? Hmmm... now there were flames present?</p><p>Different circumstances, (the NMA passed)... but I'll cut to the chase. </p><p>This GP isn't running for anything anymore. I'd be surprised if he finishes this term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 3781614, member: 37112"] Other than the glossy mailings, the other listed costs are negligible. On the converse side, on line voting was far less expensive than mail in. I'll grant the IBT didn't publish the contract voting procedures of the Constitution, but you did. Apparently no one (on these pages anyway) was listening as it became big news...after the fact. The entire IBT Constitution is available for anyone to read on many sites, including Teamster.org. IDK what criteria was considered as a threshold to use this language. Maybe one more no vote would have tipped the scale. So we're now [I]once again[/I] resurrecting that beaten to death horse? Hmmm... now there were flames present? Different circumstances, (the NMA passed)... but I'll cut to the chase. This GP isn't running for anything anymore. I'd be surprised if he finishes this term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2/3 rule used to ratify supplements
Top