So apparently DT has decided to use the 2/3 rule to ratify all the supplements that he can. Apparently this was not done at the last contract even though it could have been (If the 2/3 rule actually applies). My question is the language about the 2/3 rule. I have not seen any language that references the 2/3 rule with the supplements, only the master. This part of the constitution has been posted on BC several times but it is in reference to the master not the suppliments. Does anyone know if the constitution actually specifies the 2/3 rule for the supplements or us DT just trying to screw everyone he can.