Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2018 Contract leaks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3310217" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>Yea, I completely understood that part, as his example included this:</p><p></p><p>So, with this in mind, it really isn't that much different than the "no fault" policy that is the standard here (6 occurrences in 9 months)?</p><p></p><p>Here in lies the moral to the story, progression of discipline, where you have 2 chances to change your behavior before "end of story", as it should be.</p><p></p><p>I'm assuming these "white paper" contracts typically provide for arbitration, akin to our panel system?</p><p></p><p>Perfect example!!!...thank you.</p><p></p><p>This guy, while technically over the "limit", was never afforded the opportunity to correct his issue before being called on the carpet.</p><p></p><p>When he was made aware, he fixed it.</p><p></p><p>The system belatedly worked as designed, albeit it due to management negligence.</p><p></p><p>What BA worth his salt could not make that case at a panel or arbitration hearing???</p><p></p><p>Another term would be <em>"taking the statement out of context"</em>, which is grossly unfair?</p><p></p><p>...but I understand why you would "cherry pick", rather than address the entire thought, as it doesn't fit your agenda.</p><p></p><p>...and there he goes again.</p><p></p><p>SMH</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>~Bbbl~™</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3310217, member: 14176"] Yea, I completely understood that part, as his example included this: So, with this in mind, it really isn't that much different than the "no fault" policy that is the standard here (6 occurrences in 9 months)? Here in lies the moral to the story, progression of discipline, where you have 2 chances to change your behavior before "end of story", as it should be. I'm assuming these "white paper" contracts typically provide for arbitration, akin to our panel system? Perfect example!!!...thank you. This guy, while technically over the "limit", was never afforded the opportunity to correct his issue before being called on the carpet. When he was made aware, he fixed it. The system belatedly worked as designed, albeit it due to management negligence. What BA worth his salt could not make that case at a panel or arbitration hearing??? Another term would be [I]"taking the statement out of context"[/I], which is grossly unfair? ...but I understand why you would "cherry pick", rather than address the entire thought, as it doesn't fit your agenda. ...and there he goes again. SMH ~Bbbl~™ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2018 Contract leaks
Top