Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2018 Contract leaks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3310903" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>If that's the case, then you and your Local's attorneys may need to look yourselves in the mirror and take responsibility for the crap "white paper" contract you negotiated for them?</p><p></p><p>I still think you're embellishing a bit?</p><p>In your example, it outlines a 3 step process:</p><p></p><p>If the Company fails to satisfy this progression, how is the case not winnable?</p><p></p><p>Are we to assume that the Company can lay in the weeds and do nothing, until it reaches the discharge level, without affording the employee the opportunity to fix it.</p><p></p><p>How hard would it be to have inserted a phrase such as:</p><p></p><p>6 infractions = termination, provided the progression has been satisfied?...(instead of....period....end of story)</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry we didn't talk sooner???</p><p>We could have saved peoples jobs.</p><p></p><p>Your "preface" didn't make it right or fair out of context of the entire paragraph Sam.</p><p></p><p>Anti-union in the sense of "we have to save every employee, from themselves, at any cost"???</p><p></p><p>If that's the "Union notion" you are referring to, then I am guilty, as I do not subscribe.</p><p></p><p>I believe every employee should be able to make a mistake, then have an opportunity to correct it.</p><p></p><p>In the end, not everyone will be able to.</p><p></p><p>No idea about TDU, as I don't subscribe, why do you?</p><p>Teamsters United, why would they when they are a rival political force?</p><p>Did you make a habit of speaking highly of slates that you have run against in past local elections?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3310903, member: 14176"] If that's the case, then you and your Local's attorneys may need to look yourselves in the mirror and take responsibility for the crap "white paper" contract you negotiated for them? I still think you're embellishing a bit? In your example, it outlines a 3 step process: If the Company fails to satisfy this progression, how is the case not winnable? Are we to assume that the Company can lay in the weeds and do nothing, until it reaches the discharge level, without affording the employee the opportunity to fix it. How hard would it be to have inserted a phrase such as: 6 infractions = termination, provided the progression has been satisfied?...(instead of....period....end of story) I'm sorry we didn't talk sooner??? We could have saved peoples jobs. Your "preface" didn't make it right or fair out of context of the entire paragraph Sam. Anti-union in the sense of "we have to save every employee, from themselves, at any cost"??? If that's the "Union notion" you are referring to, then I am guilty, as I do not subscribe. I believe every employee should be able to make a mistake, then have an opportunity to correct it. In the end, not everyone will be able to. No idea about TDU, as I don't subscribe, why do you? Teamsters United, why would they when they are a rival political force? Did you make a habit of speaking highly of slates that you have run against in past local elections? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
2018 Contract leaks
Top