Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Old Man Jingles" data-source="post: 4692079" data-attributes="member: 18222">Up until the Nov 3rd election, the signature on the envelope had to match the signature on your voter precinct card on file.On the Nov 3rd election mail-in ballots, the signature was matched against the mail-in ballot request.That change occurred because Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger illegally changed the requirements of &#039;Signature Match&#039; procedures.It is my understanding that will be changed back to the statute requirements for the January 5th runoff election.The effect of this change for the November 3rd mail-in ballots is not entirely known.The estimation is that these &#039;NOT rejected&#039; votes resulted in 790 votes for Biden.That count does not wipe out Biden&#039;s 12,000 vote lead over Trump but it does narrow the margin a smidgeon.It appears Black women did not care for Trump! LOL[ATTACH=full]318698[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Old Man Jingles, post: 4692079, member: 18222"] Up until the Nov 3rd election, the signature on the envelope had to match the signature on your voter precinct card on file. On the Nov 3rd election mail-in ballots, the signature was matched against the mail-in ballot request. That change occurred because Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger illegally changed the requirements of 'Signature Match' procedures. It is my understanding that will be changed back to the statute requirements for the January 5th runoff election. The effect of this change for the November 3rd mail-in ballots is not entirely known. The estimation is that these 'NOT rejected' votes resulted in 790 votes for Biden. That count does not wipe out Biden's 12,000 vote lead over Trump but it does narrow the margin a smidgeon. It appears Black women did not care for Trump! LOL [ATTACH type="full" alt="1606196655295.png"]318698[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification