Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
43rd St not on PAS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hangin455" data-source="post: 657081" data-attributes="member: 6570"><p>The problem is that there is no way to make the shipper use the consignee that is entered in PAS. There is a limited number of "aliases" that can be entered so the consignee is recognized. SRM shipper's consignees aren't entered at all. Until there is some way to force the shippers' to use valid address/consignee information you'll have a lot of "orphaned" packages that will have to be manually dispatched (which defeats the whole purpose of PAS).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hangin455, post: 657081, member: 6570"] The problem is that there is no way to make the shipper use the consignee that is entered in PAS. There is a limited number of "aliases" that can be entered so the consignee is recognized. SRM shipper's consignees aren't entered at all. Until there is some way to force the shippers' to use valid address/consignee information you'll have a lot of "orphaned" packages that will have to be manually dispatched (which defeats the whole purpose of PAS). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
43rd St not on PAS?
Top