Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
60,000 signatures for accrediting means nothing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LagunaBrown" data-source="post: 1800887" data-attributes="member: 29765"><p>What does your little hype-man circle jerk have to do with this? </p><p></p><p></p><p>2001 Leedham 50,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 35% of the vote.</p><p>2006 Leedham 55,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 35% of the vote.</p><p>2011 Pope 50,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 17% of the vote.</p><p>2016 Sylvester 62,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate they lost election with ?????? of the vote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LagunaBrown, post: 1800887, member: 29765"] What does your little hype-man circle jerk have to do with this? 2001 Leedham 50,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 35% of the vote. 2006 Leedham 55,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 35% of the vote. 2011 Pope 50,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate, they lost election with 17% of the vote. 2016 Sylvester 62,000 petition signatures to officially accredit a TDU slate they lost election with ?????? of the vote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
60,000 signatures for accrediting means nothing?
Top