Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MyTripisCut" data-source="post: 5770144" data-attributes="member: 34797"><p>Maybe weAO maybe not.&nbsp; If you read between the lines of article 11, which SOB screamed about to the world that no one could get forced sixth punch or to work T-S if hired before Aug 1 2019, specifically in section 1-v, you’ll find that it claims that the local and the company should work out the needs if T-S is not sufficient.&nbsp; So the local is forced to look weak by “finding a resolution” while the IBT can sit back and not look bad on language that is extremely tricky when you start to break it down.&nbsp; So is the resolution to allow the company to force an unspecified amount of drivers hired before the Aug 1 date onto a T-S schedule?&nbsp; That wouldn’t have looked good either, so when they ask the IBT for clarification they blame the local?&nbsp; A lot of <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />ery&nbsp; on this my friends. A lot.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="MyTripisCut, post: 5770144, member: 34797"] Maybe weAO maybe not. If you read between the lines of article 11, which SOB screamed about to the world that no one could get forced sixth punch or to work T-S if hired before Aug 1 2019, specifically in section 1-v, you’ll find that it claims that the local and the company should work out the needs if T-S is not sufficient. So the local is forced to look weak by “finding a resolution” while the IBT can sit back and not look bad on language that is extremely tricky when you start to break it down. So is the resolution to allow the company to force an unspecified amount of drivers hired before the Aug 1 date onto a T-S schedule? That wouldn’t have looked good either, so when they ask the IBT for clarification they blame the local? A lot of :censored:ery on this my friends. A lot. [/QUOTE]

Verification