Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
705 and 710 forced to accept contract.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3841054" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>So the answer was to create a new classification that sells out the unborn???</p><p></p><p>While most present day "RPCD's" were hired knowing that they would be Tues-Saturday, they also knew that as additional drivers were hired behind them, they would matriculate to their preferred schedule.</p><p>That's a long revered Union premise called "seniority" and a fundamental building block of collective bargaining, that was conveniently bargained around amid a smokescreen of "proposals" to mask a concession.</p><p></p><p>With this in mind, where was the consideration for the seniority preloader who was forced from a Mon-Fri schedule, to a Tues-Sat schedule as a result of Saturday ground deliveries???</p><p></p><p>As far as OT is concerned, I will say it again, we already had Article 37 language to protect us from excessive OT.</p><p></p><p>....and if it wasn't sufficient, then fix it.</p><p></p><p>In the end, I continue to call <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/2012/bsbullf.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":bsbullf:" title="Bsbullf :bsbullf:" data-shortname=":bsbullf:" /> to the notion that the IBT was reacting to member proposals when creating this new, concessionary, 22.4 hybrid driver classification.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3841054, member: 14176"] So the answer was to create a new classification that sells out the unborn??? While most present day "RPCD's" were hired knowing that they would be Tues-Saturday, they also knew that as additional drivers were hired behind them, they would matriculate to their preferred schedule. That's a long revered Union premise called "seniority" and a fundamental building block of collective bargaining, that was conveniently bargained around amid a smokescreen of "proposals" to mask a concession. With this in mind, where was the consideration for the seniority preloader who was forced from a Mon-Fri schedule, to a Tues-Sat schedule as a result of Saturday ground deliveries??? As far as OT is concerned, I will say it again, we already had Article 37 language to protect us from excessive OT. ....and if it wasn't sufficient, then fix it. In the end, I continue to call :bsbullf: to the notion that the IBT was reacting to member proposals when creating this new, concessionary, 22.4 hybrid driver classification. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
705 and 710 forced to accept contract.
Top