Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 871942" data-attributes="member: 4805"><p>Scientists always talk in terms of probability, that's just the nature of science. </p><p>As to how it's different? Aside from the fact that there are no credible scientists who support the conspiracy theory, there is a huge difference between analyzing the structure of the building and the stresses it was under to determine what caused it to collapse (what the scientists and structural engineers did) and making up a wild story about secret demolition teams, secret payoffs, massive coverups, and President Bush all without a shred of evidence (what the conspiracy guys did).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jones, post: 871942, member: 4805"] Scientists always talk in terms of probability, that's just the nature of science. As to how it's different? Aside from the fact that there are no credible scientists who support the conspiracy theory, there is a huge difference between analyzing the structure of the building and the stresses it was under to determine what caused it to collapse (what the scientists and structural engineers did) and making up a wild story about secret demolition teams, secret payoffs, massive coverups, and President Bush all without a shred of evidence (what the conspiracy guys did). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Top