Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
A Lamb Wins the PA 18th District
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 3416492" data-attributes="member: 68849"><p>You wouldn't answer the question,Clinton's vote total wasn't down measurably, the three election cycles showed a decline. Got that? From a liberal rag, I offer this as an answer to the question I posed, which you refused to answer.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/the-decimation-of-the-democratic-party-visualized/?utm_term=.0aba28a6546c" target="_blank">The decimation of the Democratic Party, visualized</a>. My point of attack is aimed at these statetements:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Vote totals prove this to be an incorrect statement. Did the numbers decline successively in three presidential elections? The answer would be, Yes.</p><p>The question should be , Why,? if one truly wants to know the answer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There was enough for Trump to defeat sixteen republican hopefuls, and one democratic challenger, namely H Clinton to win the presidency. Enough voters, whatever their stripes deemed Trump's course more palatable. In three three successive elections, democrats and independents have left democratic ideology, and in the last election embraced Trump's platform. That is truth, your side can't accept it, hence the manifestation of Mueller. Try your best.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="floridays, post: 3416492, member: 68849"] You wouldn't answer the question,Clinton's vote total wasn't down measurably, the three election cycles showed a decline. Got that? From a liberal rag, I offer this as an answer to the question I posed, which you refused to answer. [URL='https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/the-decimation-of-the-democratic-party-visualized/?utm_term=.0aba28a6546c']The decimation of the Democratic Party, visualized[/URL]. My point of attack is aimed at these statetements: Vote totals prove this to be an incorrect statement. Did the numbers decline successively in three presidential elections? The answer would be, Yes. The question should be , Why,? if one truly wants to know the answer. There was enough for Trump to defeat sixteen republican hopefuls, and one democratic challenger, namely H Clinton to win the presidency. Enough voters, whatever their stripes deemed Trump's course more palatable. In three three successive elections, democrats and independents have left democratic ideology, and in the last election embraced Trump's platform. That is truth, your side can't accept it, hence the manifestation of Mueller. Try your best. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
A Lamb Wins the PA 18th District
Top