Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 607701" data-attributes="member: 14596">once again, the taking the lunch out regardless of whether the driver took lunch came from the lawsuit.&nbsp; The court ordered UPS to make the drivers take lunch.&nbsp; The way to make sure, was to look at time cards and make sure lunch was taken out.&nbsp; So UPS centers told drivers that a lunch would be taken out no matter what, and ordered the drivers to take the lunch.&nbsp; Some drivers continued to work anyway.In my experience, the lunch issue has little to nothing to do with trying to look good on paper and everything to do with getting the hell out of dodge sooner, for any age driver.&nbsp; Using super-vision as you call it would be a great tool for holding people accountable to doing the job.&nbsp; Except for the fact that that is not allowed in the contract.&nbsp; Technology cannot be used for discipline, it can only be used as a backup to direct observation.&nbsp; Hence the need for OAOs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 607701, member: 14596"] once again, the taking the lunch out regardless of whether the driver took lunch came from the lawsuit. The court ordered UPS to make the drivers take lunch. The way to make sure, was to look at time cards and make sure lunch was taken out. So UPS centers told drivers that a lunch would be taken out no matter what, and ordered the drivers to take the lunch. Some drivers continued to work anyway. In my experience, the lunch issue has little to nothing to do with trying to look good on paper and everything to do with getting the hell out of dodge sooner, for any age driver. Using super-vision as you call it would be a great tool for holding people accountable to doing the job. Except for the fact that that is not allowed in the contract. Technology cannot be used for discipline, it can only be used as a backup to direct observation. Hence the need for OAOs. [/QUOTE]

Verification