Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Acorn census
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 554672" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>No Tooner, I didn't mean it that way. During the Bush years when someone dare question Bush policy, the immediate chorus from the elephants was: </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Now even when the questions pertained to just concern over the lack of fiscal responsibility as it pertained to various policies, it was often both here and outside BC that the above was tossed around like candy at Halloween. And look now at where that failure to use fiscal restraint got us! Had republicans made fiscal responsiblity a chief principle instead of smoke and mirror words, do you think democrats would own Washington lock, stock and barrel? Voters walked away because of what other choice did they have. If we are gonna have fiscal irresponsibility, let's put the experts in charge.</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p>So since the precedence was established under the Bush years, I think it only fitting that democrats, Diesel in this case, should be allowed to use the same treatment in this new era of gov't! Therefore my urging to him to let it rip!</p><p> </p><p>You guys tee'd it up and I'm only cheering Diesel on to kick that sucker so hard it lands in the cheap parking lot!</p><p> </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p><p> </p><p>More unintended consequences!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 554672, member: 2189"] No Tooner, I didn't mean it that way. During the Bush years when someone dare question Bush policy, the immediate chorus from the elephants was: Now even when the questions pertained to just concern over the lack of fiscal responsibility as it pertained to various policies, it was often both here and outside BC that the above was tossed around like candy at Halloween. And look now at where that failure to use fiscal restraint got us! Had republicans made fiscal responsiblity a chief principle instead of smoke and mirror words, do you think democrats would own Washington lock, stock and barrel? Voters walked away because of what other choice did they have. If we are gonna have fiscal irresponsibility, let's put the experts in charge. :happy-very: So since the precedence was established under the Bush years, I think it only fitting that democrats, Diesel in this case, should be allowed to use the same treatment in this new era of gov't! Therefore my urging to him to let it rip! You guys tee'd it up and I'm only cheering Diesel on to kick that sucker so hard it lands in the cheap parking lot! :happy-very: More unintended consequences! :wink2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Acorn census
Top