Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Alexander vs. Fedex Willis vs. Fedex
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 3341450" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>Income from self employment income subject to Social Security is" qualified income" but the settlement is not subject to Social Security given that it's reported on Box 3 of the 1099. I was covered under all 7 years set forth in the suit and 15 of the 16 so called "claim" years. In December 2016 I was declared totally disabled by Social Security retroactive to November 2015. So for 20127 there is no " qualified income" for 2017. I do think I can lawfully claim another exemption for 2017 which will help. Should I have gone for SSD? I did so based on the off the record advice from a person well versed on the matter . I guess they were right. Despite the fact that 74% of all first time disability claims are denied you have a 1 in 10 chance of getting a reconsideration and the average wait time for a formal hearing even if granted one is 21 months . Mine went through uncontested in just 3 months. I guess when they saw that I've got enough titanium in me to make yourself a set of golf clubs they simply said "get him out of here". The problem for 2017 is that fact that I was getting a subsidy for health insurance under the ACA. What the settlement does however is that I'll have to pay those subsidies back. BTW I asked Judge Miller to order that the settlement be allocated and identified on a year by year basis in the hope that it would improve our chances of being able to go back and amend each year but he refused..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 3341450, member: 58386"] Income from self employment income subject to Social Security is" qualified income" but the settlement is not subject to Social Security given that it's reported on Box 3 of the 1099. I was covered under all 7 years set forth in the suit and 15 of the 16 so called "claim" years. In December 2016 I was declared totally disabled by Social Security retroactive to November 2015. So for 20127 there is no " qualified income" for 2017. I do think I can lawfully claim another exemption for 2017 which will help. Should I have gone for SSD? I did so based on the off the record advice from a person well versed on the matter . I guess they were right. Despite the fact that 74% of all first time disability claims are denied you have a 1 in 10 chance of getting a reconsideration and the average wait time for a formal hearing even if granted one is 21 months . Mine went through uncontested in just 3 months. I guess when they saw that I've got enough titanium in me to make yourself a set of golf clubs they simply said "get him out of here". The problem for 2017 is that fact that I was getting a subsidy for health insurance under the ACA. What the settlement does however is that I'll have to pay those subsidies back. BTW I asked Judge Miller to order that the settlement be allocated and identified on a year by year basis in the hope that it would improve our chances of being able to go back and amend each year but he refused.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Alexander vs. Fedex Willis vs. Fedex
Top