Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownRecycler" data-source="post: 3696345" data-attributes="member: 73454">Having too many division is very problematic in a structured organization while having too few doesn&#039;t divide the responsibility. One extra division, the 22.4, is too many which can leads to excessive delegation and grievance while having no monetary penalty following backlog after backlog of no consequence.Definition of delegation1: the act of empowering to act for another<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">the delegation of responsibilities</li>
</ul>2: a group of persons chosen to represent others<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">the state&#039;s congressional delegation</li>
</ul>Monetary penalty is an extremely effective consequence because it keeps business check and balance.Without the penalty in the contract agreement for doing wrong, psychologically, it is the same as having no consequence for doing wrong. Human will tend to continue the wrong doing without consequences. Sure, you can have company team of people who are paid lawyer or disputing party member, but, when come to winning or losing, there will never be monetary costs leading to free labor, extensive headache, energy consuming, red taping, etc.According to the new contract, Article 8 - National Grievance Procedure, 3., , there are now lesser committee member that over-seeing the grievance system. Should the grievance flooded, the less remaining committee member may face an over-whelming response of the untested invention of the 22.4 division. Is it too soon to lay off the Grievance Committee?Am adding one more reason why I am voting NO, the layoff of the Grievance Committee members are too soon for the new idea of 22.4 division.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownRecycler, post: 3696345, member: 73454"] Having too many division is very problematic in a structured organization while having too few doesn't divide the responsibility. One extra division, the 22.4, is too many which can leads to excessive delegation and grievance while having no monetary penalty following backlog after backlog of no consequence. [SIZE=5][B]Definition of delegation[/B][/SIZE] 1: the act of empowering to act for another [LIST] [*]the delegation of responsibilities [/LIST] 2: a group of persons chosen to represent others [LIST] [*]the state's congressional delegation [/LIST] Monetary penalty is an extremely effective consequence because it keeps business check and balance. Without the penalty in the contract agreement for doing wrong, psychologically, it is the same as having no consequence for doing wrong. Human will tend to continue the wrong doing without consequences. Sure, you can have company team of people who are paid lawyer or disputing party member, but, when come to winning or losing, there will never be monetary costs leading to free labor, extensive headache, energy consuming, red taping, etc. According to the new contract, Article 8 - National Grievance Procedure, 3., , there are now lesser committee member that over-seeing the grievance system. Should the grievance flooded, the less remaining committee member may face an over-whelming response of the untested invention of the 22.4 division. Is it too soon to lay off the Grievance Committee? Am adding one more reason why I am voting NO, the layoff of the Grievance Committee members are too soon for the new idea of 22.4 division. [/QUOTE]

Verification