BrownRecycler
Well-Known Member
After long period of my debate, squabble, and filibustering, am voting no, and I'll tell you why.
According to the language and contractual wage agreement, it is my best conscious and belief that the contract undermining the value of seniority and its 2nd tier wage system while creating unnecessary divisions among itself.
For package handler, those with year older seniority should get more money not equal or less than other employee with younger seniority date.
The 22.4 languages are dividing the seniority and rank of the RPCD while creating problematic future forthcoming of grievance lacking monetary consequence for the company to stay obedience to the contract.
While I fully commend the increase pension as they should in every contract in response to the dollar value and reducing the pre-eligibility period for medical benefits, it is not enough without the proper balance of the workforce.
My editor in chief @BrownArmy will answer any question that you might have. Thank you, and for solidarity!
According to the language and contractual wage agreement, it is my best conscious and belief that the contract undermining the value of seniority and its 2nd tier wage system while creating unnecessary divisions among itself.
For package handler, those with year older seniority should get more money not equal or less than other employee with younger seniority date.
The 22.4 languages are dividing the seniority and rank of the RPCD while creating problematic future forthcoming of grievance lacking monetary consequence for the company to stay obedience to the contract.
While I fully commend the increase pension as they should in every contract in response to the dollar value and reducing the pre-eligibility period for medical benefits, it is not enough without the proper balance of the workforce.
My editor in chief @BrownArmy will answer any question that you might have. Thank you, and for solidarity!