Amy Coney Barrett

newfie

Well-Known Member
Ok, so let me ask you this. Are you willing accept a federal income tax surcharge let's say 20% on top of your FIT liability with all proceeds going to the states in order to support the massive increase in Medicaid funded demand for prenatal, post natal pediatric and all other necessary support items in order to insure the physical health and well being of the mother and child?

Don't try to side step the question. Just give me a yes or no answer. The reason being is that we keep hearing the same talk out of pro lifers but they never seem willing to get out their wallets.

Perhaps that might explain why according to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans are in favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade. Like they say...money talks and bull feces walks.

no i think we go the other way and sterilize democrats. much more economical solution
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Ok, so let me ask you this. Are you willing accept a federal income tax surcharge let's say 20% on top of your FIT liability with all proceeds going to the states in order to support the massive increase in Medicaid funded demand for prenatal, post natal pediatric and all other necessary support items in order to insure the physical health and well being of the mother and child?

Don't try to side step the question. Just give me a yes or no answer. The reason being is that we keep hearing the same talk out of pro lifers but they never seem willing to get out their wallets.

Perhaps that might explain why according to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans are in favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade. Like they say...money talks and bull feces walks.
Overturning doesn't stop any state from allowing abortions.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
no i think we go the other way and sterilize democrats. much more economical solution
I take that as being unwilling to accept such a tax increase. But, like any other self righteous so called "Christian" you're going to simply tell a young confused often teen aged girl with no money that she can't have an abortion then just hop on your self righteous crusade bus and just drive off and abandon her while at the same time a rich American woman is boarding a plane for Europe to get her abortion .
 

The big package

Well-Known Member
I take that as being unwilling to accept such a tax increase. But, like any other self righteous so called "Christian" you're going to simply tell a young confused often teen aged girl with no money that she can't have an abortion then just hop on your self righteous crusade bus and just drive off and abandon her while at the same time a rich American woman is boarding a plane for Europe to get her abortion .
Here's a thought , how about families stay together and raise their kids right , teach them common sense and right from wrong .
Listen to them when they have a problem , you know be a parent !!! Just sayin !!!
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Ok, so let me ask you this. Are you willing accept a federal income tax surcharge let's say 20% on top of your FIT liability with all proceeds going to the states in order to support the massive increase in Medicaid funded demand for prenatal, post natal pediatric and all other necessary support items in order to insure the physical health and well being of the mother and child?

Don't try to side step the question. Just give me a yes or no answer. The reason being is that we keep hearing the same talk out of pro lifers but they never seem willing to get out their wallets.

Perhaps that might explain why according to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans are in favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade. Like they say...money talks and bull feces walks.
Was that tax needed before Roe v. Wade?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I take that as being unwilling to accept such a tax increase. But, like any other self righteous so called "Christian" you're going to simply tell a young confused often teen aged girl with no money that she can't have an abortion then just hop on your self righteous crusade bus and just drive off and abandon her while at the same time a rich American woman is boarding a plane for Europe to get her abortion .

take it as you want I believe in birth control not murder . teach your rutting dogs to use birth control
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
Ok, so let me ask you this. Are you willing accept a federal income tax surcharge let's say 20% on top of your FIT liability with all proceeds going to the states in order to support the massive increase in Medicaid funded demand for prenatal, post natal pediatric and all other necessary support items in order to insure the physical health and well being of the mother and child?

Don't try to side step the question. Just give me a yes or no answer. The reason being is that we keep hearing the same talk out of pro lifers but they never seem willing to get out their wallets.

Perhaps that might explain why according to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans are in favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade. Like they say...money talks and bull feces walks.
If your defense of killing pre birth babies is to save money, why not do the same to poor leeches on society after birth? You are clearly a commie.
 

DELACROIX

In the Spirit of Honore' Daumier
Ok, so let me ask you this. Are you willing accept a federal income tax surcharge let's say 20% on top of your FIT liability with all proceeds going to the states in order to support the massive increase in Medicaid funded demand for prenatal, post natal pediatric and all other necessary support items in order to insure the physical health and well being of the mother and child?

Don't try to side step the question. Just give me a yes or no answer. The reason being is that we keep hearing the same talk out of pro lifers but they never seem willing to get out their wallets.

Perhaps that might explain why according to a survey done by the Kaiser Family Foundation which is as nonpolitical as it gets only 29% of Americans are in favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade. Like they say...money talks and bull feces walks.

If men start being men again and take responsibility for their offspring the Federal Government would not be on the hook for the rearing of the children. No ..we continue to try to get rid of the nuclear family, the concept of marriage between a man and woman and the responsibilities of raising a family..The Democratic platform does nothing to change the tide of single family households and actively promote free cradle to the grave Pie in the sky solutions without the disciplines that our fathers and grandfathers handed down.

Just look at the so called martyrs of this BLM movement .. and see the results of coddling and labeling everybody a victim of a systematic racist society...These men created their own downfall by not growing up and adopted the stupid thug mentality that has been shoved down the throats by their new and improved culture that promotes selfish behavior at the expense of others..
 
Last edited:

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Well boys chew on this . A copyrighted story out tonight from the NYT and yes you can dismiss it but can you disprove it, but according to the story you want to know what the vaccine that saved Dear Leader's life was developed from? .. Aborted fetal tissue.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Here's a thought , how about families stay together and raise their kids right , teach them common sense and right from wrong .
Listen to them when they have a problem , you know be a parent !!! Just sayin !!!
You don't say. Tell us about all the awards you've received for you child rearing skills. And while you're at it tell us about your master's degree in child psychology and social studies.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
If your defense of killing pre birth babies is to save money, why not do the same to poor leeches on society after birth? You are clearly a commie.
It's not about saving money but rather the lack of commitment on the part of pro lifers for providing direct financial support for the children born from unplanned pregnancies .So tell me how many of the pro lifers currently or in the past have had to rely on Roosevelt New Deal and or Johnson Great Society social programs in order to provide for their kids?
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
You don't say. Tell us about all the awards you've received for you child rearing skills. And while you're at it tell us about your master's degree in child psychology and social studies.
Hopefully he has no degree.
That's part of the problem. Libs "teaching"libs in lib universities how to raise kids "right"
Your response is telling that you have no idea.
 
Top