Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Andrew McCabe to retire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3418045" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>Because the narrative had been put forth that Trump had colluded with the Russians and had fired Comey to stop any investigation into it. Comey also provided political cover for Hillary, who should of been charged with mishandling of top secret documents, and obstructing justice by deleting emails that she had been subpoenaed to turn over. Furthermore it wasn't Comey's call to make on Clinton, that should've been Lynch's decision. Trump as president was well within his authority to be dissatisfied with Comey and to fire him. Now it's a matter of determining if his intent was obstruction, and it's ridiculous what the matter is that he's accused of obstructing. The whole thing is a farce set in motion by both the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration with willing participants in the FBI. Peter Strzok is the head of counter intelligence, and he was the lead in the Flynn investigation, the Hillary Clinton exoneration, and the FISA court warrants to spy on both the Trump campaign and the transition. And was on Mueller's investigative team until his text messages came out and Mueller removed him. And his text to his lover just came out talking about having a dinner party with the FISA court judge instead of a one on one meeting to provide cover. His words. He's going down, McCabe is going down, and who knows who's going down with them. Susan Rice sent herself an email to remind herself that Obama wanted everything done by the book. It was a very odd thing to say and considering they trotted her out to say Benghazi was over a video that enraged Muslims, never proven, it does make you wonder just how high this goes. The thing is, please understand this, none of this would have ever seen the light of day if Hillary had won. They after all were working on her behalf to stop Trump from winning. They way overstepped their authority and it really doesn't matter if it were Democrats or Republicans. Working to remove a sitting president, no matter how much you dislike him assuming he's not breaking the law, is an attempted coup. It's treason. If you care about our democracy you can't say it's ok if it's our side. There's supposed to be a thing called the loyal opposition in our system. If you don't like what the current administration is doing, again assuming they're acting within the bounds of the Constitution, then you work towards removing them in the next election. Not try to overthrow them now by any means. If people don't understand this, or make excuses for their side when caught, then our democracy won't last and eventually we may see States like California go their own way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3418045, member: 24302"] Because the narrative had been put forth that Trump had colluded with the Russians and had fired Comey to stop any investigation into it. Comey also provided political cover for Hillary, who should of been charged with mishandling of top secret documents, and obstructing justice by deleting emails that she had been subpoenaed to turn over. Furthermore it wasn't Comey's call to make on Clinton, that should've been Lynch's decision. Trump as president was well within his authority to be dissatisfied with Comey and to fire him. Now it's a matter of determining if his intent was obstruction, and it's ridiculous what the matter is that he's accused of obstructing. The whole thing is a farce set in motion by both the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration with willing participants in the FBI. Peter Strzok is the head of counter intelligence, and he was the lead in the Flynn investigation, the Hillary Clinton exoneration, and the FISA court warrants to spy on both the Trump campaign and the transition. And was on Mueller's investigative team until his text messages came out and Mueller removed him. And his text to his lover just came out talking about having a dinner party with the FISA court judge instead of a one on one meeting to provide cover. His words. He's going down, McCabe is going down, and who knows who's going down with them. Susan Rice sent herself an email to remind herself that Obama wanted everything done by the book. It was a very odd thing to say and considering they trotted her out to say Benghazi was over a video that enraged Muslims, never proven, it does make you wonder just how high this goes. The thing is, please understand this, none of this would have ever seen the light of day if Hillary had won. They after all were working on her behalf to stop Trump from winning. They way overstepped their authority and it really doesn't matter if it were Democrats or Republicans. Working to remove a sitting president, no matter how much you dislike him assuming he's not breaking the law, is an attempted coup. It's treason. If you care about our democracy you can't say it's ok if it's our side. There's supposed to be a thing called the loyal opposition in our system. If you don't like what the current administration is doing, again assuming they're acting within the bounds of the Constitution, then you work towards removing them in the next election. Not try to overthrow them now by any means. If people don't understand this, or make excuses for their side when caught, then our democracy won't last and eventually we may see States like California go their own way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Andrew McCabe to retire
Top