Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 855417" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>The sad thing about this case is that Casey Anthony will have gotten away with murder. This case required the jury to connect the dots of circumstantial evidence and there never was going to be concrete proof that she did it. This wasnt a TV show, this wasnt a slam dunk case where every piece of evidence conclusively proved that Casey Anthony did it.</p><p></p><p>Look at the Scott Peterson trial. They had HALF of the evidence that they had with Casey Anthony and he is sitting on death row here in california. In this case, the jury was able to connect the dots "circumstantially" as to Petersons guilt. They had no murder weapon, no cause of death, no witnesses, no dna and most importantly NO BODY.</p><p></p><p>It was his actions, lies and circumstances that connected him to the death of his wife, who while at trial, he proclaimed his innocence. His wifes body was dumped into the san francisco bay and it eventually floated up and washed ashore along with her unborn baby.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that connected him to the crime was his deceptive behavior. An affair, trips to the beach, fresh cement around the garage, cement remnants in his fishing boat. The jury was able to see a pattern of guilt and on that alone, they concluded that it was Scott Peterson who last saw his wife and was responsible for her to be missing and presumed dead.</p><p></p><p>This jury failed to do the same. Circumstantially, all the arrows still point to casey. No matter what piece of evidence you look at, the arrows point to casey. The most important fact of the case ( the 31 days ) was discounted by this jury as "normal" and this is where they went wrong.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, the jury discounted her "lies" to the police, her family and to the court. An innocent person does not "incriminate" herself to the police if she is innocent. If you are innocent and clear of any wrongdoing, then you surely dont lie to the police. </p><p></p><p></p><p>There was no reason to lie to the police other than to conceal the guilt and cupability of the crime. Thirdly, the basic facts of the case when considered "individually" conclude that casey anthony was responsible.</p><p></p><p>Lets look at three pieces of evidence.</p><p></p><p>1) the collapsable laundry bag that the baby was thrown into the swamp was one of two pieces that were sold in a SET, one was cylindrical and the other was rectangular. The matching rectangular bag was found in casey anthonys bedroom and the matching cylindrical bag was found in the swamp. (casey had access to both)</p><p></p><p>2) the winnie the pooh blanket that the baby was found to have been wrapped in is a match to the bedding, sheets, pillow cases, bumpers of calee anthonys bed and the only thing missing is the blanket. (casey had access to all)</p><p></p><p>3) the shirt that calee anthony was wearing upon her tragic death was a shirt that was kept in casey anthonys car in a backpack and never was in the home. (casey anthony solely had access to this)</p><p></p><p></p><p>These three items all pointed at casey anthony and should have warranted a discussion. </p><p></p><p>This jury simply bought into the nonsense that was the defense of the case which was to confuse the issues with nonsense about molestation, affairs and a possible drowning that both casey and her father turned into a staged murder scene.</p><p></p><p></p><p>These things simply do not stand to reason, but they did in the minds of this jury. At the end of the day, we accept this verdict and move on with life. In a jailhouse letter, Casey Anthony writes that if she is released, she is determined to get pregnant and have another baby as soon as possible.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This I find disgusting.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 855417, member: 17969"] The sad thing about this case is that Casey Anthony will have gotten away with murder. This case required the jury to connect the dots of circumstantial evidence and there never was going to be concrete proof that she did it. This wasnt a TV show, this wasnt a slam dunk case where every piece of evidence conclusively proved that Casey Anthony did it. Look at the Scott Peterson trial. They had HALF of the evidence that they had with Casey Anthony and he is sitting on death row here in california. In this case, the jury was able to connect the dots "circumstantially" as to Petersons guilt. They had no murder weapon, no cause of death, no witnesses, no dna and most importantly NO BODY. It was his actions, lies and circumstances that connected him to the death of his wife, who while at trial, he proclaimed his innocence. His wifes body was dumped into the san francisco bay and it eventually floated up and washed ashore along with her unborn baby. The only thing that connected him to the crime was his deceptive behavior. An affair, trips to the beach, fresh cement around the garage, cement remnants in his fishing boat. The jury was able to see a pattern of guilt and on that alone, they concluded that it was Scott Peterson who last saw his wife and was responsible for her to be missing and presumed dead. This jury failed to do the same. Circumstantially, all the arrows still point to casey. No matter what piece of evidence you look at, the arrows point to casey. The most important fact of the case ( the 31 days ) was discounted by this jury as "normal" and this is where they went wrong. Secondly, the jury discounted her "lies" to the police, her family and to the court. An innocent person does not "incriminate" herself to the police if she is innocent. If you are innocent and clear of any wrongdoing, then you surely dont lie to the police. There was no reason to lie to the police other than to conceal the guilt and cupability of the crime. Thirdly, the basic facts of the case when considered "individually" conclude that casey anthony was responsible. Lets look at three pieces of evidence. 1) the collapsable laundry bag that the baby was thrown into the swamp was one of two pieces that were sold in a SET, one was cylindrical and the other was rectangular. The matching rectangular bag was found in casey anthonys bedroom and the matching cylindrical bag was found in the swamp. (casey had access to both) 2) the winnie the pooh blanket that the baby was found to have been wrapped in is a match to the bedding, sheets, pillow cases, bumpers of calee anthonys bed and the only thing missing is the blanket. (casey had access to all) 3) the shirt that calee anthony was wearing upon her tragic death was a shirt that was kept in casey anthonys car in a backpack and never was in the home. (casey anthony solely had access to this) These three items all pointed at casey anthony and should have warranted a discussion. This jury simply bought into the nonsense that was the defense of the case which was to confuse the issues with nonsense about molestation, affairs and a possible drowning that both casey and her father turned into a staged murder scene. These things simply do not stand to reason, but they did in the minds of this jury. At the end of the day, we accept this verdict and move on with life. In a jailhouse letter, Casey Anthony writes that if she is released, she is determined to get pregnant and have another baby as soon as possible. This I find disgusting. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top