Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 855495" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>While unpleasant as it is, watching all the testimony via <a href="http://www.myfoxorlando.com/subindex/news/anthony_case" target="_blank">http://www.myfoxorlando.com/subindex/news/anthony_case</a> , I gave the weight of all the evidence presented its due. No matter how you spell it out, the evidence presented does not EXCLUDE casey anthony, it includes her more than anyone else on the face of the earth.</p><p></p><p>Ok, not that I want to start a huge debate over evidence or anything, but lets take the parents, both of them were impeached by evidence and witnesses, so throw both of their contributions out, HOW DOES THAT MAKE CASEY INNOCENT?</p><p></p><p>The defense ADMITTED from the jump, that they were going to PROVE that the little girl drowned in an accident at the grandparents home, and that a conspiracy between casey and her father existed. This is an ADMISSION of guilt. YOU dont need to ASSUME anything. They layed out the truth for you, the mother was a part of a death ( whether accidental or not) and this EXCLUDES a kidnapper, her mother, Roy Kronk and anyone else you can name.</p><p></p><p>The question then becomes, how did she drown? Who was watching her at the time? Who designed the cover up (dad or casey)? Who prepared the body? Who dumped the body? Jose Baez himself limited the suspects to either Casey or George, but George wasnt on trial.</p><p></p><p>Jose Baez did put George on trial with the introduction of the affair. This affair, while worthless did prove the dad was a cheater and a liar, but that only goes to impeachment so throw dads whole testimony out the window. How does this establish he had anything to do with the death of the granddaughter?</p><p></p><p>The defense threw all the wet spaghetti against the wall and some stuck. It confused the jury and they lost sight of what they were suppose to be paying attention to.</p><p></p><p>Just like the OJ trial when friend/LEE Bailey cross examined Mark Furmann and introduced an old conversation at a marine corps center where Bailey accused Mark Furmann of using the N-WORD. This had nothing to do with OJ, but it confused the jury and brought out individual prejudices. It ultimately played a big part in the aquittal.</p><p></p><p>Jose did the same. If you look at each piece of evidence, and give each piece the weight it deserves, everything will point at Casey.</p><p></p><p>I listened to an attorney today who told me that if you changed one aspect of this case, and you applied everything Casey Said, Did and Acted, you would have gotten a conviction. Whats that change?</p><p></p><p>Make her a 22 year old black girl. Every lie, every action, her lifestyle, not knowing who the baby daddy is and her 3 years of unemployment would have been magnified if she was a woman of color. Being a pretty, white, upper middle class woman made a huge difference in this case. I tend to agree with this opinion, and thats a sad statement of todays societal belief system.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 855495, member: 17969"] While unpleasant as it is, watching all the testimony via [URL]http://www.myfoxorlando.com/subindex/news/anthony_case[/URL] , I gave the weight of all the evidence presented its due. No matter how you spell it out, the evidence presented does not EXCLUDE casey anthony, it includes her more than anyone else on the face of the earth. Ok, not that I want to start a huge debate over evidence or anything, but lets take the parents, both of them were impeached by evidence and witnesses, so throw both of their contributions out, HOW DOES THAT MAKE CASEY INNOCENT? The defense ADMITTED from the jump, that they were going to PROVE that the little girl drowned in an accident at the grandparents home, and that a conspiracy between casey and her father existed. This is an ADMISSION of guilt. YOU dont need to ASSUME anything. They layed out the truth for you, the mother was a part of a death ( whether accidental or not) and this EXCLUDES a kidnapper, her mother, Roy Kronk and anyone else you can name. The question then becomes, how did she drown? Who was watching her at the time? Who designed the cover up (dad or casey)? Who prepared the body? Who dumped the body? Jose Baez himself limited the suspects to either Casey or George, but George wasnt on trial. Jose Baez did put George on trial with the introduction of the affair. This affair, while worthless did prove the dad was a cheater and a liar, but that only goes to impeachment so throw dads whole testimony out the window. How does this establish he had anything to do with the death of the granddaughter? The defense threw all the wet spaghetti against the wall and some stuck. It confused the jury and they lost sight of what they were suppose to be paying attention to. Just like the OJ trial when friend/LEE Bailey cross examined Mark Furmann and introduced an old conversation at a marine corps center where Bailey accused Mark Furmann of using the N-WORD. This had nothing to do with OJ, but it confused the jury and brought out individual prejudices. It ultimately played a big part in the aquittal. Jose did the same. If you look at each piece of evidence, and give each piece the weight it deserves, everything will point at Casey. I listened to an attorney today who told me that if you changed one aspect of this case, and you applied everything Casey Said, Did and Acted, you would have gotten a conviction. Whats that change? Make her a 22 year old black girl. Every lie, every action, her lifestyle, not knowing who the baby daddy is and her 3 years of unemployment would have been magnified if she was a woman of color. Being a pretty, white, upper middle class woman made a huge difference in this case. I tend to agree with this opinion, and thats a sad statement of todays societal belief system. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top