Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trplnkl" data-source="post: 855508" data-attributes="member: 13254"><p><span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>I agree again. but not 100% this time. Mind you, I can only go by what I saw/heard presented during the trial. Since I'm home most of the day I did (at least) listen to most of the evidence presentations and caught recaps of testimony. </strong></em></span></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #8b4513"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'comic sans ms'"><em><strong>When the judge was giving the jury instructions, he went into great detail of the charges and definition of "reasonable doubt". If the evidence proves guilt except you have a doubt in your mind, the doubt has to be reasonable NOT a shadow, not a whimsical but a reasonable doubt, one can acquit. He was giving the jury a chance to go with a conviction even though there was only circumstantial evidence. That's how I took it anyway. </strong></em></span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trplnkl, post: 855508, member: 13254"] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]I agree again. but not 100% this time. Mind you, I can only go by what I saw/heard presented during the trial. Since I'm home most of the day I did (at least) listen to most of the evidence presentations and caught recaps of testimony. [/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#8b4513][SIZE=3][FONT=comic sans ms][I][B]When the judge was giving the jury instructions, he went into great detail of the charges and definition of "reasonable doubt". If the evidence proves guilt except you have a doubt in your mind, the doubt has to be reasonable NOT a shadow, not a whimsical but a reasonable doubt, one can acquit. He was giving the jury a chance to go with a conviction even though there was only circumstantial evidence. That's how I took it anyway. [/B][/I][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anthony Case
Top