Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="canon" data-source="post: 167668" data-attributes="member: 8423"><p>It's a legitimate source. Or are you saying the govt doesn't employ a legal team? And just because you disagree with the legalities of our actions doesn't mean we violated international law. Like I said, I understand there are two positions on the subject. Trying to discredit the source doesn't invalidate the actions.. I think we both know that would be a logical fallacy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I know why R.678 was drafted. I don't need to "try" to make it into anything, it says what it says. If you need me to post it again, I'll be happy to.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If we <strong>do</strong> accept the UN's authority, we also have to give weight to the resolutions already written. <em>We acted under UN authority granted in UN R.678</em>. So if you want to say the UN had no authority in writing that, then they also have no authority in denying the use of force. I think you're looking for a double standard that only condemns the actions of a republican president.</p><p></p><p>Again, and this time in english... assigning "guilt" doesn't address the problem of getting out of Iraq.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="canon, post: 167668, member: 8423"] It's a legitimate source. Or are you saying the govt doesn't employ a legal team? And just because you disagree with the legalities of our actions doesn't mean we violated international law. Like I said, I understand there are two positions on the subject. Trying to discredit the source doesn't invalidate the actions.. I think we both know that would be a logical fallacy. I know why R.678 was drafted. I don't need to "try" to make it into anything, it says what it says. If you need me to post it again, I'll be happy to. If we [B]do[/B] accept the UN's authority, we also have to give weight to the resolutions already written. [I]We acted under UN authority granted in UN R.678[/I]. So if you want to say the UN had no authority in writing that, then they also have no authority in denying the use of force. I think you're looking for a double standard that only condemns the actions of a republican president. Again, and this time in english... assigning "guilt" doesn't address the problem of getting out of Iraq. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
Top