Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 168893" data-attributes="member: 4805"><p>Good start!</p><p></p><p> And bad ending. Again <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/sad.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":sad:" title="Sad :sad:" data-shortname=":sad:" />. It is NOT International Law. You have consistently been unable to point out where it says, <em>in black and white</em>, that an occupying power must meet certain preconditions before they leave. Once again, here are the original sources:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090723082024/http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm" target="_blank">Geneva Conventions</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/lawwar.asp" target="_blank">Hague Conventions</a></p><p></p><p>Read them. Then read them again. There are no preconditions for ending an occupation. None. Nada.</p><p></p><p>Once again, this all just hand waving. Your strategy seems to be posting a whole lot of links and names of organisations and then claiming, without a shred of evidence (and plenty to the contrary), that they all somehow support your argument. They don't. Read the the original sources:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090723082024/http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm" target="_blank">Geneva Conventions</a></p><p></p><p><a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/lawwar.asp" target="_blank">Hague Conventions</a></p><p></p><p>There are no preconditions for ending an occupation. None. Nada.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's the reason that you are the only one trying to make this ridiculous argument. Even Ari Fleischer wouldn't try it <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/wink.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink:" title="Wink :wink:" data-shortname=":wink:" /></p><p></p><p> Take care</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jones, post: 168893, member: 4805"] Good start! And bad ending. Again :sad:. It is NOT International Law. You have consistently been unable to point out where it says, [I]in black and white[/I], that an occupying power must meet certain preconditions before they leave. Once again, here are the original sources: [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20090723082024/http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm']Geneva Conventions[/URL] [URL='http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/lawwar.asp']Hague Conventions[/URL] Read them. Then read them again. There are no preconditions for ending an occupation. None. Nada. Once again, this all just hand waving. Your strategy seems to be posting a whole lot of links and names of organisations and then claiming, without a shred of evidence (and plenty to the contrary), that they all somehow support your argument. They don't. Read the the original sources: [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20090723082024/http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm']Geneva Conventions[/URL] [URL='http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/lawwar.asp']Hague Conventions[/URL] There are no preconditions for ending an occupation. None. Nada. It's the reason that you are the only one trying to make this ridiculous argument. Even Ari Fleischer wouldn't try it :wink: Take care [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
Top