Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="canon" data-source="post: 168941" data-attributes="member: 8423"><p>That's kind of catchy... I like this one:</p><p></p><p>Bill lied and Gore cried.</p><p></p><p>There's only one bin Laden who is responsible for the attacks, the rest are successful business owners and condemn his actions (unless you can provide proof stating otherwise). We haven't found the wmd material known to have been in the country at the time the weapons inspectors left, all we can assume is Saddam was <em>secretly</em> complying with the resolutions <span style="font-size: 9px">(yeah right)</span>. I'm not sure why we should be after the Saudi's... we have a base there and good relations. And if you think Bush doesn't care about catching bin Laden, I believe that would be a wrong assumption on your part. That's about the only thing at this point that would turn his ratings around outside of removing troops from Iraq.</p><p></p><p>Darlene, I respect your position on the war, but it really doesn't get us home any faster. Not even if you add more exclamation points to the end of your sentences.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="canon, post: 168941, member: 8423"] That's kind of catchy... I like this one: Bill lied and Gore cried. There's only one bin Laden who is responsible for the attacks, the rest are successful business owners and condemn his actions (unless you can provide proof stating otherwise). We haven't found the wmd material known to have been in the country at the time the weapons inspectors left, all we can assume is Saddam was [I]secretly[/I] complying with the resolutions [SIZE="1"](yeah right)[/SIZE]. I'm not sure why we should be after the Saudi's... we have a base there and good relations. And if you think Bush doesn't care about catching bin Laden, I believe that would be a wrong assumption on your part. That's about the only thing at this point that would turn his ratings around outside of removing troops from Iraq. Darlene, I respect your position on the war, but it really doesn't get us home any faster. Not even if you add more exclamation points to the end of your sentences. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Anti War Protests
Top