Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="100%ORIONComplianceGuy" data-source="post: 5912263" data-attributes="member: 109837">Well, they they are weak and scared to acknowledge/force something that is crystal clear. Let me put it to you another way. If that is the route&nbsp; the union is taking then they are acknowledging that UPS can work us over 9 1/2 hours two days a week every week with no recourse, despite having two pieces of language in the article that specifically addresses that. If that is the case, WTF even bother putting that in there? <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤦‍♂️" title="Man facepalming&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_facepalming:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_facepalming:" />The entire thing started with the language saying they are not to work us over 9.5 the other two days. Then they added a language that included penalty for just that. It’s Crystal clear in both the grammar/language aspect and in regard to context. If the union agrees with the company on this issue, then that will be one of their biggest failures in recent memory.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="100%ORIONComplianceGuy, post: 5912263, member: 109837"] Well, they they are weak and scared to acknowledge/force something that is crystal clear. Let me put it to you another way. If that is the route the union is taking then they are acknowledging that UPS can work us over 9 1/2 hours two days a week every week with no recourse, despite having two pieces of language in the article that specifically addresses that. If that is the case, WTF even bother putting that in there? 🤦‍♂️ The entire thing started with the language saying they are not to work us over 9.5 the other two days. Then they added a language that included penalty for just that. It’s Crystal clear in both the grammar/language aspect and in regard to context. If the union agrees with the company on this issue, then that will be one of their biggest failures in recent memory. [/QUOTE]

Verification