Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Macbrother" data-source="post: 4750493" data-attributes="member: 42759">But you weren&#039;t denied your day in court - that&#039;s the thing man.&nbsp; Your side filed something like 65 cases covering a very broad range of issues (fraud, mail-in voting, election law, etc) and you lost virtually every single one.&nbsp; Yes - some were on standing, but not all of them.&nbsp; The bottom line is - there was zero evidence, at least that could be proved in a court of law, for the type of widespread, election-changing fraud your side claimed was &quot;obvious.&quot;&nbsp; Speaking of media, Fox News, OANN, and Newsmax have all had to issue retractions on their claims about dominion, and now Sidney Powell is being sued for libel.&nbsp; But I suppose it&#039;s only the &quot;left wing media,&quot; that distorts the truth, right?&nbsp; Or, I suppose, if the distortion is in a direction that is personally pleasing - you&#039;re ok with it.Think about what the grand claim is.&nbsp; There was widespread fraud - but only committed by the democrats, only in the states Trump lost, and only regarding Trump, himself alone.&nbsp; All other down ballot races were valid.&nbsp; How would a rational, nonpartisan person treat a claim like this?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Macbrother, post: 4750493, member: 42759"] But you weren't denied your day in court - that's the thing man. Your side filed something like 65 cases covering a very broad range of issues (fraud, mail-in voting, election law, etc) and you lost virtually every single one. Yes - some were on standing, but not all of them. The bottom line is - there was zero evidence, at least that could be proved in a court of law, for the type of widespread, election-changing fraud your side claimed was "obvious." Speaking of media, Fox News, OANN, and Newsmax have all had to issue retractions on their claims about dominion, and now Sidney Powell is being sued for libel. But I suppose it's only the "left wing media," that distorts the truth, right? Or, I suppose, if the distortion is in a direction that is personally pleasing - you're ok with it. Think about what the grand claim is. There was widespread fraud - but only committed by the democrats, only in the states Trump lost, and only regarding Trump, himself alone. All other down ballot races were valid. How would a rational, nonpartisan person treat a claim like this? [/QUOTE]

Verification