Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Are we on the brink of civil war 2.0?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Macbrother" data-source="post: 4752966" data-attributes="member: 42759"><p>Well, it's very simple, actually. I don't know Robert Barnes but I have listened to Mark Levin on numerous occasions so I will focus on him. He's very clearly a right-wing partisan who makes money telling people like the both of you exactly what you want to hear. If he said otherwise, you'd subscribe to someone else. So he has a very vested interest in keeping you tuned in. </p><p></p><p>Now, let's compare that to the election fraud cases. Are the judges who made those rulings all former left-wing lawyers who now make money telling the left what they want to hear? No. Some are Clinton-appointed, Bush-appointed, Obama-appointed, there's even one Reagan-appointed. A whopping <em>38 </em>are Trump-appointed. So, judges from across the political spectrum, across five states <strong>decisively </strong>rejected claims of fraud (such as they were argued) and claims of illegality. </p><p></p><p>These are lifetime appointments with a salary that is not dependent upon how many viewers they get, nor do they have to worry about next years election cycle. These are by all accounts a neutral arbiter with no vested interest - totally unlike your friend, Mark Levin. So yes, hopefully you'll forgive me when people like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB roundly rejected your claims about the legality of how PA voted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Macbrother, post: 4752966, member: 42759"] Well, it's very simple, actually. I don't know Robert Barnes but I have listened to Mark Levin on numerous occasions so I will focus on him. He's very clearly a right-wing partisan who makes money telling people like the both of you exactly what you want to hear. If he said otherwise, you'd subscribe to someone else. So he has a very vested interest in keeping you tuned in. Now, let's compare that to the election fraud cases. Are the judges who made those rulings all former left-wing lawyers who now make money telling the left what they want to hear? No. Some are Clinton-appointed, Bush-appointed, Obama-appointed, there's even one Reagan-appointed. A whopping [I]38 [/I]are Trump-appointed. So, judges from across the political spectrum, across five states [B]decisively [/B]rejected claims of fraud (such as they were argued) and claims of illegality. These are lifetime appointments with a salary that is not dependent upon how many viewers they get, nor do they have to worry about next years election cycle. These are by all accounts a neutral arbiter with no vested interest - totally unlike your friend, Mark Levin. So yes, hopefully you'll forgive me when people like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB roundly rejected your claims about the legality of how PA voted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Are we on the brink of civil war 2.0?
Top