Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4795319" data-attributes="member: 63706">Nope. Nuclear weapons would have to be deployed in a very strategic manner to come close to wiping us out. Don&#039;t know if you realize how many nuclear weapons have already been detonated on the surface and below ground.As for CO2, that&#039;s pseudoscientific bologna. The predictions have been going on for over 30 years, none have come close to being true. Climate scientists have even had to falsify temperature records just to keep the fantasy of CO2 caused global warming alive. It&#039;s a fully debunked, unsupportable theory.However, disrupting food supply chains is more likely to cause extinctions of many species. Millions of people in population centers aren&#039;t going to care about endangered species lists when everyone is facing death by starvation. The cost of what you want to happen is much higher than your wishful thinking and fairy tales have led you to believe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4795319, member: 63706"] Nope. Nuclear weapons would have to be deployed in a very strategic manner to come close to wiping us out. Don't know if you realize how many nuclear weapons have already been detonated on the surface and below ground. As for CO2, that's pseudoscientific bologna. The predictions have been going on for over 30 years, none have come close to being true. Climate scientists have even had to falsify temperature records just to keep the fantasy of CO2 caused global warming alive. It's a fully debunked, unsupportable theory. However, disrupting food supply chains is more likely to cause extinctions of many species. Millions of people in population centers aren't going to care about endangered species lists when everyone is facing death by starvation. The cost of what you want to happen is much higher than your wishful thinking and fairy tales have led you to believe. [/QUOTE]

Verification