Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1039850" data-attributes="member: 2189">What I read above is that in democrat administrations, taxes were cut and spending actually grew less than the revenue generated which in one sense left a surplus of new revenue say to pay down debt?&nbsp; In the case of the republicans, in each example you listed, revenue went up but spending by an even greater amount.&nbsp; And you list as myth &quot;We can only cut taxes by cutting spending by the same amount..&quot; and under fact you go on to say &quot; If we would just stop spending so much money, we would have a surplus,&nbsp; taxes could be even lower than they are now, and we could start paying&nbsp; off the national debt.&nbsp; The problem isn’t that we aren’t being taxed&nbsp; enough.&nbsp; The problem is that the government is spending too much money.&quot;But your own facts above prove that the ones doing the excess spending over and above revenue are the republicans.&nbsp; Obama is nothing but another Bush IMO and has proven himself such regardless of the myths from democrats.&nbsp; But looking at history itself that you posted, why do I&nbsp; have any reason to think that in Romney, history and republican track record will change?

</blockquote>

[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 1039850, member: 2189"] What I read above is that in democrat administrations, taxes were cut and spending actually grew less than the revenue generated which in one sense left a surplus of new revenue say to pay down debt? In the case of the republicans, in each example you listed, revenue went up but spending by an even greater amount. And you list as myth [B]"We can only cut taxes by cutting spending by the same amount.."[/B] and under fact you go on to say [B]" If we would just stop spending so much money, we would have a surplus, taxes could be even lower than they are now, and we could start paying off the national debt. The problem isn’t that we aren’t being taxed enough. The problem is that the government is spending too much money." [/B] But your own [B]facts [/B]above prove that the ones doing the excess spending over and above revenue are the republicans. Obama is nothing but another Bush IMO and has proven himself such regardless of the myths from democrats. But looking at history itself that you posted, why do I have any reason to think that in Romney, history and republican track record will change?[LEFT][COLOR=#000000] [/COLOR][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]

Verification