Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="100%ORIONComplianceGuy" data-source="post: 5992601" data-attributes="member: 109837">Not even remotely close to being accurate.That is obviously exactly what I meant. The context alone should’ve made it obvious.Exactly! And it would take a hell of a lot more incentive than there is now for BTC in order for enough people to create a fork that matches BTC. The hard Forks that have been attempted so far have not been very successful. None of them seem to have any chance of ever matching or replacing BTC. For various reasons.It’s not a maxi versus alt-coin proponent issue. There are lots of people who are into both. Being a bitcoin Maxi or the latter doesn’t change the fact that bitcoin’s incentive structure and track record make it a superior choice over the forks. Or cryptocurrency in general if you are looking at widespread adoption. Even if they are fundamentally better.How is it insulting if its sole purpose is exactly that? I don’t own any Trac but I still recognize it for what it is meant to be. And it’s not meant to be the same thing as bitcoin. otherwise, I would share your opinion about its primary use as being insulting to the potential use of the technology.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="100%ORIONComplianceGuy, post: 5992601, member: 109837"] Not even remotely close to being accurate. That is obviously exactly what I meant. The context alone should’ve made it obvious. Exactly! And it would take a hell of a lot more incentive than there is now for BTC in order for enough people to create a fork that matches BTC. The hard Forks that have been attempted so far have not been very successful. None of them seem to have any chance of ever matching or replacing BTC. For various reasons. It’s not a maxi versus alt-coin proponent issue. There are lots of people who are into both. Being a bitcoin Maxi or the latter doesn’t change the fact that bitcoin’s incentive structure and track record make it a superior choice over the forks. Or cryptocurrency in general if you are looking at widespread adoption. Even if they are fundamentally better. How is it insulting if its sole purpose is exactly that? I don’t own any Trac but I still recognize it for what it is meant to be. And it’s not meant to be the same thing as bitcoin. otherwise, I would share your opinion about its primary use as being insulting to the potential use of the technology. [/QUOTE]

Verification